PPREs new RX4 project ;)
nuff said... crazy people down there :D
http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...66316880_n.jpg more info: http://www.facebook.com/PulsePerformance?ref=ts&sk=wall |
Yea just seen that on Facebook, pretty crazy... lol.. Will have to wait and see how she performs :)...
|
I was waiting for this thread :)
|
mad buggers!
|
Running out of fingers to count
|
2 rotors are sick, 3 rotors are really sick. 4 rotors are like god. a 6 rotor, thats like god's god right there!
|
I thought this was a joke till I saw who was building it.
|
Curious why they bypassed a 5 rotor?
|
:dunno:
I guess 72* phased rotors just wouldn't sound cool enough? :lol: It would certainly cause some extra work in the engine management department. At least with 6-rotors you could phase 1-4, 2-5, 3-6 together, and with no-split timing it would be somewhat simpler/mainstream as far as ECU's. |
I think they'll have three 180° pairs instead.
Think of who's building the shaft (Jeff Bruce?). Think of the way 4 rotor shafts with a 90° firing order are made = two 180° pairs with a 90° offset in the middle and two 45° offset counterweights at the ends only. So it's logical that this 6 rotor will have three 180° pairs. 60° firing order. It's easy once you break it down for simplicity: 2 rotor = 180° 3 rotor = 120° 4 rotor = 90° 6 rotor = 60° Rotor pairs of a 6 rotor (as I imagine they would be if only using two counterweights): 1 0° 2 180° 3 60° 4 240° 5 120° 6 300° ^notice each rotor pair is phased 180° apart from each other, then each pair is 120° off from the other pairs. Leading firing order: 1 0° 3 60° 5 120° 2 180° 4 240° 6 300° One ignition event every 60°. However you can cheat and only go every 120° by using three FC leading coils triggered like any wasted spark arrangement. This makes it more compatible with most ECUs. Rotors 1 and 2 will fire together. 3 and 4 together. 5 and 6 etc. It'll run a lot like a 20B, but instead of having three single leading coils and three leading spark plugs firing at 120° intervals, you keep the 120° and swap the coils for dual output coils. That's how I'd do it. Pretty simple. But the 5 rotor still intrigues me. I'd actually subscribe to a thead where someone's building a 5 rotor and it isn't a hoax. :) |
With a proper ECU (e.g. Pectel SQ-6) 12 coils and 12 injectors can be run fully sequentially without having to be terribly clever at all. Considering the scope of this project, I could even say that it's inexpensive with a straight face.
Regardless, I'm interested to see how it comes out. |
i saw it and was surprised that it wasn't up here. hope they start a thread should be cool i think they said it would have 8-1000hp na pp off-course:nod:
but i would really like to hear a 5 rotor, i mean inline 5 race bike engines (rc149) and so did the vr6. thanks oliver |
bloody kiwis
mad bunch they are:icon_tup: |
Originally Posted by Trots*88TII-AE*
(Post 10950453)
:dunno:
I guess 72* phased rotors just wouldn't sound cool enough? :lol: It would certainly cause some extra work in the engine management department. At least with 6-rotors you could phase 1-4, 2-5, 3-6 together, and with no-split timing it would be somewhat simpler/mainstream as far as ECU's. Didn't think about it like that. |
how do they get away with cooling it? Seems like it would be tough.
|
i wanna see the exhaust manifold for this and the length of the rods to hold this together...
|
And now its up and running.
|
i'd like to see the e-shaft and what they did to offset the deflection of such a long shaft.
if it makes even close to 1000hp reliably i will be surprised, due to the length of the shaft. shorter engines actually can make more reliable power. call me Mr negative, my GF does everyday. :) say even every rotor has a support bearing, with length comes twist and shear. take a steel rod that's 1" long and try to twist it and you can't, take that same rod 20' long and twist even with moderate force and you can easily. |
Sick!
|
that exhaust is sick... should be able to bake some potatoes under that hood.:icon_tup:
wonder how much the long block weighs? |
This is insane! And the exhaust manifold is definitely a work of art.
|
Any dyno results, even its on the flywheel? Not only I, want to know what that beast does. I think between 700 and 800bhp
|
Somehow I don't think shaft twist is going to be an issue. They may want to externally brace the keg though.
|
How does one go about figuring out how heavy to make counterweights, and how to place them?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands