Nope.
|
Originally Posted by junito1
(Post 10069877)
are e6x's? capable of neg. split?
B |
Whats does that mean... The software is whats holding it back?
|
Originally Posted by junito1
(Post 10071067)
Whats does that mean... The software is whats holding it back?
B |
Got it all fired up. Found where the trail split stuff starts in the raw file (around Offset 800). Looks like it's a no go for negative split from what I can tell. The hex data in those spots bottoms out at 00. Don't think it's possible to go to a lower value than that. This would require a firmware revision w/ an updated user interface.
|
Originally Posted by BDC
(Post 10071102)
Got it all fired up. Found where the trail split stuff starts in the raw file (around Offset 800). Looks like it's a no go for negative split from what I can tell. The hex data in those spots bottoms out at 00. Don't think it's possible to go to a lower value than that. This would require a firmware revision w/ an updated user interface.
The firmware in the ECU might be bounds checking it or using it as an unsigned number. That would really kill any chances without a firmware update. Of course, how familiar are you with negative numbers in binary? Your negative numbers are from 80 - FF where FF is -1. Or if its a 16 bit value, then FFFF to 8000 where FFFF is -1. |
Originally Posted by farberio
(Post 10072345)
The firmware in the ECU might be bounds checking it or using it as an unsigned number. That would really kill any chances without a firmware update.
Of course, how familiar are you with negative numbers in binary? Your negative numbers are from 80 - FF where FF is -1. Or if its a 16 bit value, then FFFF to 8000 where FFFF is -1. B |
Just tried taking a test E6K map and, via hex editor, changing the first 11 bars in the 0-2krpm split map from 00 to FF. Forced a change of 255 which actually showed up in the editor.
|
Do me a favor and test this out by manually spinning the CAS though. I would hate for it to fire 255deg advanced on you.
|
Neg split is running your trailing timing more advanced than your leading. Correct? I am running a megsquirt Ms1, is this possible with the ms1?
Thanks Keith |
Originally Posted by 12AllWays
(Post 10750146)
Neg split is running your trailing timing more advanced than your leading. Correct? I am running a megsquirt Ms1, is this possible with the ms1?
Thanks Keith |
So, I read through this thread, and am impressed with the amount of actuall information in it. A thought came to my mind, and I'm not too sure how well it would work in the upper rev ranges, but for those that don't have an ecu capable of running negative split, how would just switching the wires around work? Put your trailing on the leading, and the leading on the trailing. Obviously this would only be for an n/a application though.
|
Negative split is designed for low vacuum/load levels. Fact...Mazda uses it for better emissions and fuel economy. It will also quiet down the exhaust pulses a bit. I heard you should not run negative under heavy loads as it may cause detonation.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands