FD vs Lightning
I am coming back from Silver Dollar today and a Ford F150 lightning starts trying to get me to race. I am betting that the numbers painted on my Windows from the races are prevoking him. We are at about 60mph and there are no cars around so I say what the hey. I crawl up to his truck bed and he guns it. I down shift to 3rd and do the same about .5 second later. I quickly pull about 8 car lengths on him. I looked as if he dropped an ancor or something. I shut it down at around 110mph and a couple of seconds later he drives by and gives a thumbs up.
Him SVT lighning with some kind of exhaust and rims. Me: 1993 RX-7, GT35R, etc. etc. |
Originally Posted by 855m0n0
Him SVT lighning with some kind of exhaust and rims.
|
I seriously doubt that the rims were supercharged. That would be an interesting technology if they were. It also had a fraternal order of police sticker. Those add lots of power.
|
Originally Posted by Kory_yahi
Were the rims supercharged? If they wern't supercharged, thats probably why he lost. Rims make or break races.
|
Originally Posted by audiobot7
:confused:
|
Thats really stupid of him to race to 60+, after 60 their aerodynamics kill them.
|
My naibor has a 95 lightning with a few racing mods, he blew his tranny and just put in an allison, i drove it the other day 1>2 barks the tires(its an auto)
|
Nice Kill.
|
There is a couple fast ones around here...One ran a 10.98 at 124...
|
Originally Posted by Kory_yahi
It's sarcasim. He mentioned the fact that the lightning had rims when he mentioned mods. I thought it was a tad bit funny since rims don't do anything when it comes to racing. :)
-Alex |
A 10 second truck would be crazy to see on the highway. . . . I wonder if he is pulling 10s on street tires or on brag slicks....
|
Originally Posted by Mr rx-7 tt
There is a couple fast ones around here...One ran a 10.98 at 124...
|
The faster lightnings are the ones that have "altezza" style tail lights. If you beat one of those, you pretty much can kill all the other ones.
Good Kill. |
Originally Posted by TT_Rex_7
Are you kidding?! You do know that wheels are considered unsprung weight right? Unsprung weight has a greater effect on acceleration than weight supported by the suspension. 100 pounds of stuff in your vehicle will knock ~ a 10th of a second of your quarter mile time. Just 20 extra pounds of unsprung weight will have a MUCH greater effect. Reason being is that it takes more power to turn the heavier wheels. :rolleyes:
-Alex exactly what i was thinking |
Originally Posted by Fatman0203
10 at 124 that doesnt sound right? :confused: I would guess for him to have a higher trap.
|
When I was a silver dollar several cars were running 10s with really low trap speeds. They were in the 118 range.
|
Are you kidding?! You do know that wheels are considered unsprung weight right? Unsprung weight has a greater effect on acceleration than weight supported by the suspension. 100 pounds of stuff in your vehicle will knock ~ a 10th of a second of your quarter mile time. Just 20 extra pounds of unsprung weight will have a MUCH greater effect. Reason being is that it takes more power to turn the heavier wheels. -Alex While we're on the topic of fast trucks, anyone ever race one of the srt-10 trucks? |
Theres a guy around here with a lightning that runs high 11's and he traps lower then me, he said like 114. I ran a 12.9 and trapped 116. So 10's at 124 doesn't sound wrong for one of those trucks.
Austin |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands