fc vs. 92 egale talon
what do u guys think this guy at school thinks he can beat me and his car is a non turbo stock. who do u think will win?
|
umm wtf? let me guess.... HS kids street racing?
by FC...wtf do u mean? stock? modded?TII? S4?S5? N/A? ........cmon.. "JUST LET IT DRIFT!!!! " yeahhhh... :dubs: ...give yourself a :uh: |
you'll take him if you know how to shift
|
it's a stock 86 non turbo
|
im good at shifting but i still need work on my launches
|
1986 Mazda RX-7 GXL 8.5 16.5
1992 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX 7.0 15.3 (same time as talon?) you tell me. |
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
1986 Mazda RX-7 GXL 8.5 16.5
1992 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX 7.0 15.3 (same time as talon?) you tell me. Even with a DOHC could be taken easily if you can ship |
Originally Posted by Jager
A NON-TURBO TALON. Which would be the ESI. The GSX had AWD and a turbo, equivalent to do the TSI AWD Talon. Are you the one that always posts the track times to cars that are barely simular?
Even with a DOHC could be taken easily if you can ship |
And every comparison you've been off.
You compare a stock TII to a j-spec'd Convertable with a heavier hood (added weight, loss of compression (how many jspecs are perfect? Who swaps to stay stock?) and call it the same. It's just annoying. |
i was right on the G35 one lol. i dont rememebr anything ive posted about conv. i only posted the G35c/sedan and the GTO.
|
Maybe it was someone else that always posts times of cars that are nowhere close. My bad.
|
a gsx runs faster than a 15.3 maybe a gst might run that on a bad day but awd ones are in the high 14's
i see it all day long and yes i own one of those too but a 91 tsi not gsx but same thing anywho uuummmm you should still be able to win you would have the rear wheel drive advantage over his fwd and you would have more ponies 146 compared to 135 or 92 if he has the real low model but probably 135 so 11 horses more plus launch advantage and weight is pretty close but yes you will win if you dont mess up |
come on guys, you cant believe those online 1/4 and 0-60 charts are accurate...there are so many other factors involved, mainly driving ability and condition of the car.
|
Originally Posted by 87_rocket
come on guys, you cant believe those online 1/4 and 0-60 charts are accurate...there are so many other factors involved, mainly driving ability and condition of the car.
|
i think you'll take him, those things are really not that nice, and its a 1g N/A. you're N/A i assume? you should still take him, just keep a cool head on the launch, visualize the launch and then act as if the talon isn't even there, that you are at your favorite light just racing yourself. you are the one d00d
|
scarry to think we were in highschool once (or last year in my case...)
|
Originally Posted by snowball
scarry to think we were in highschool once (or last year in my case...)
|
Originally Posted by 87_rocket
come on guys, you cant believe those online 1/4 and 0-60 charts are accurate...there are so many other factors involved, mainly driving ability and condition of the car.
but anyhow that is the reason for averages you cant just see one race or one "chart" and think that that is the correct info research and better yet witness more races and cars and then you will have a better estimate of how fast certain cars are |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands