(noob) Want megasquirt ECU and E85 (FD3S)
(noob) want megasquirt ecu and e85 what do i need. could you make a list
|
Originally Posted by edgars95rx7
(Post 10918004)
(noob) want megasquirt ecu and e85 what do i need. could you make a list
|
Originally Posted by Barban
(Post 10918007)
I think what you need most is knowledge of how to use the search feature. Why would you want to use a megasquirt?
|
Because they are cheap to buy...
|
I could spend $50 on an exhaust manifold from Ebay... It'd be cheap, but it would also be a piece of shit. What's your point?
Megasquirts barely belong on carb'd vehicles, DEF not on FDs |
I believe there is one megasquirt fd on the forum. Better options out there.
If cheap is your priority then the FD is not for you. Converting to e85 is an expensive affair. |
Originally Posted by edgars95rx7
(Post 10918004)
(noob) want megasquirt ecu and e85 what do i need. could you make a list
MS3 supports E85 using a flex fuel sensor: http://www.msextra.com/doc/ms3/flexfuel.html The MS has supported the FD crank sensor and ignition since MS1, but MS3 being the newest version with sequential injection and a host of new features, it is the 'Squirt you want to use. You'll need the V3.57 main board, MS3X expander, MS3 daughtercard, and then the typical MS wiring harness as well as the MS3X harness. You can buy all this pre-assembled from DIY AutoTune, no electronics knowledge necessary. You can control the twin turbos with some work since there are plenty of spare outputs, but as far as I know at the moment there is no plug and play setup for that. You'll have to set it up yourself and experiment a bit.
Originally Posted by fendamonky
(Post 10918066)
I could spend $50 on an exhaust manifold from Ebay... It'd be cheap, but it would also be a piece of shit. What's your point?
Megasquirts barely belong on carb'd vehicles, DEF not on FDs |
MegaSquirt is alright, I had it on my old MX-3 but there isnt really anyone to tune it. And like others have said, theres plenty of other options that are plug and play for the FD. Save up another two weeks or so and get a PowerFC used. It'll save you time, hassle, and everyone tunes it.
|
Once modifications are in place, what are the advantages to E85 over a relatively simple AI system?
|
my FC ran 11.42@122mph with a S5 hybrid turbo ,but still gets 9L/100km highway
using MS2 v3 with the zeal daughterboard. must be working good enough |
my sa22c ran 12.345 @ on the brakes, now does consistant 121mph terminals. also using a s5 hybrid turbo (smaller than FC3Sdrift's one)
I use ms2extra and would highly suggest a zeal board (not available when I needed one) |
What you 'ran' or dynoed with another model car on a MS system is irrelvant. The OP has an FD.
|
It is not irrelevant. Engines are engines are engines. They take air and fuel, compress it, spark to ignite it, then exhaust it.
The only thing different about the FD as far as running it is the stock twin turbo setup. I would use MS3+MS3X to run an FD because you need the I/O. The only reasons I can think of that there aren't more FDs running MS are: 1) FD owners like spending lots of money (the rest of the car is very expensive compared to an FC) 2) FD owners aren't likely to try something nobody else had tried. It isn't like MS won't run an FD engine. FD owners would just rather use what everyone else has already tried. Somebody has to be first. Give MS a try. I think you'll find our feature set compares favorably with the "other guys." And we are adding more features every day, so if there is something you want that isn't there, ask! If it is possible to do, and other cars can benefit, it is likely I will do it. Ken |
Originally Posted by 2RotorsNaDream
(Post 10918495)
MegaSquirt is alright, I had it on my old MX-3 but there isnt really anyone to tune it. And like others have said, theres plenty of other options that are plug and play for the FD. Save up another two weeks or so and get a PowerFC used. It'll save you time, hassle, and everyone tunes it.
|
Originally Posted by muythaibxr
(Post 10927646)
It is not irrelevant. Engines are engines are engines. They take air and fuel, compress it, spark to ignite it, then exhaust it.
Originally Posted by muythaibxr
(Post 10927646)
The only thing different about the FD as far as running it is the stock twin turbo setup.
Originally Posted by muythaibxr
(Post 10927646)
The only reasons I can think of that there aren't more FDs running MS are:
1) FD owners like spending lots of money (the rest of the car is very expensive compared to an FC)
Originally Posted by muythaibxr
(Post 10927646)
.....FD owners aren't likely to try something nobody else had tried. It isn't like MS won't run an FD engine. FD owners would just rather use what everyone else has already tried.
Originally Posted by muythaibxr
(Post 10927646)
Somebody has to be first.
And just so everyone on the MS forum understands, this was moved from the 3rd Gen. section. Meaning I didn't come here just to pick a fight. |
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
(Post 10928216)
Oh really. Take your rotary powered car to any experienced piston mechanic and have him rebuild it, modify it and then tune it. Let us know how that goes.
Yes, and significant difference too. Smacks of jealousy or insecurity...or both. I think it's safe to say that we don't "like spending lots of money" any more than any other enthusiast. MS is probably a decent system for an FC. But from all I've read and from advice from gurus whose opinions I respect it's not the best value. Price and cost are two different things. I can live with this. See above and below for additional details. And last. And just so everyone on the MS forum understands, this was moved from the 3rd Gen. section. Meaning I didn't come here just to pick a fight. You are right tho, it may not be the best value, depending on what you value. If you want something that you can plug in & it'll work, the megasquirt isn't your best choice. If you want something that will really teach you how engines work & can be controlled, as well as something that will force you to learn a bit about electronics, wiring and programming, then it'll pay for itself. |
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
(Post 10928216)
Oh really. Take your rotary powered car to any experienced piston mechanic and have him rebuild it, modify it and then tune it. Let us know how that goes.
Yes, and significant difference too. Smacks of jealousy or insecurity...or both. I think it's safe to say that we don't "like spending lots of money" any more than any other enthusiast. MS is probably a decent system for an FC. But from all I've read and from advice from gurus whose opinions I respect it's not the best value. Price and cost are two different things. As far as cost vs value, how about this: You can trust your Gurus and spend a lot of money on a PowerFC or whatever it is you want to use, let someone else do your install, and maybe you'll be happy that way. (If you are that's fine, to each his own). If you actually want to know how it all works and learn to tune it yourself (which provides a LOT more benefits. I can't remember the number of times I've fixed problems on peoples' PowerFCs, Hydras, using the knowledge I gained from tuning MS installs), MS is the best system out there for that. Knowing how to do it all yourself is far more valuable than taking it to someone else and spending a lot of money to let them set it up IMO. As far as being able to run the engine and get a good tune, the MS3 is as capable as just about any other system out there, and if there's something you think it should do that it doesn't currently do, I can add that feature. I can live with this. See above and below for additional details. And just so everyone on the MS forum understands, this was moved from the 3rd Gen. section. Meaning I didn't come here just to pick a fight. To answer the OP's question: As far as running on e85 goes, If you plan on only running e85 you don't really need anything special from the MS side. Converting the fuel system to run with E85 is a pain as I understand it though. If you want to be able to run E85 *and* regular gasoline, the MS gives you several options for that. We currently support flex-fuel sensors to sense the amount of ethanol vs gasoline and respond accordingly as far as the amount of fuel injected and ignition timing. I'm in the process of adding the ability to use that sensor's output to change boost control targets as well. You can also run switchable tables, and just flip a switch when you want to switch fuels. There are other options as well, but those are probably the easiest. Ken |
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
(Post 10928216)
Oh really. Take your rotary powered car to any experienced piston mechanic and have him rebuild it, modify it and then tune it. Let us know how that goes.
There is nothing wrong with plug and play. It has it's place fulfilling a significant void between stock and real performance. There is also something to be said for having a shop set you up for a "safe tune". I have run the accel and Haltech ecu set ups. So I can't talk about the others. I prefer the UNLIMITED capabilities of the Megasquirt varieties. Cheap doesn't make it junk! |
Originally Posted by BlownPickl
(Post 10930453)
I found this to be a bit comical.
Originally Posted by BlownPickl
(Post 10930453)
How many FD drivers do you think could "rebuild it, modify it and then tune it." Let us know how that goes!
But you make no sense. What is your point? When I said it I was referring to the average piston mechanic that would be lost on a rotary engine. Hell, I really wouldn't trust a MAZDA tech with my car. Most of them were in grade school when these cars were new and have never seen one. And there's little cross-over from a Renesis beyond basic short block stuff.
Originally Posted by BlownPickl
(Post 10930453)
There is nothing wrong with plug and play.......
Originally Posted by BlownPickl
(Post 10930453)
Cheap doesn't make it junk!
IMHO there is simply a better option for the OP than a MS system. |
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
(Post 10931988)
IMHO there is simply a better option for the OP than a MS system.
Our job is to tell him the options in a non-biased manner and let him choose. My problem was that all the responses from the FD owners were not "non-biased." Ken |
I have been running a Power FC for about 7 years and although its good, it does have it limits not to mention having to run through a 20 year old wiring loom.... My track fd which im building I am looking at running a Microtech and my mates S14 Nissan Silvia which we are dropping a 13BT engine out of a series 5 (or TII) into, i am looking at the MegaSquirt or Microtech ECU. To be fair tho, the deciding factor will be budget but I am eager to see the abilities of the MegaSquirt as it is an unknown brand here in New Zealand..
EVERY ECU maker always started somewhere (usually right at the bottom) and people doubted the now "trusted" ones in their early days too im sure, hell i know of some brands that are bagged constantly but people still stand by them today, they must be good for someone.... Which reminds me of something a guy i know said to me: "An ECU is only as good as the person tuning it" Id be keen to try a MegaSquirt but in saying that, its an "unknown" product here in New Zealand and people do tend to stay with proven products but the new guys need a chance to prove themselves too... |
all that megasquirt needs for credibility is a nice orange anodized box with heat sink fins and you can bump up the price to 1600$:)
i have used it on a dozen cars and it works better than my haltech, (i hate it by the way, my haltech i mean). |
So, the Megasquirt ECU is not that popular with the FD crowd, why not?
How many are out there using MS? |
I think it's a "chicken and egg" problem.
There aren't many (any) using the MS on FD because nobody has tried it. Nobody is willing to be first. Ken |
Originally Posted by R_1
(Post 10941968)
So, the Megasquirt ECU is not that popular with the FD crowd, why not?.....
Originally Posted by muythaibxr
(Post 10942037)
........There aren't many (any) using the MS on FD because nobody has tried it. Nobody is willing to be first.
That thread went from September 2005 to May 2006 (over 1.5 years) and he was still working on it. Then he apparently quit as there were no further updates despite requests for one. The OP in that thread was last on the board in October 2011. A guy in my area has been trying to install it with a build that's currently lasted over two years. He's also trying to do E85 which is another thing that seems pointless, especially with the available AI systems now. Regardless, I'm not sure where he's at with either one. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands