IRP EFR7670 Low Boost Dyno Results

 
Old 01-26-18, 09:15 AM
  #1  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
IRP EFR7670 Low Boost Dyno Results

Had a chance to tune another fd we built with our EFR7670 single turbo kit. Relevant specs on the build are our Stage 3 ports, RX Parts seals, AEM Infinity ems, IGN-1A coils, and our fuel system with 725/2000cc injectors. The car put down 378 wheel hp and 359 tq at only 13.8lbs of boost on pump gas alone. The car does have meth but we wanted to see what it could do without it. The turbo responds instantly and boost control is rock solid with our equal length stainless steel manifold. I believe this turbo is the ultimate replacement for the stock twins. This translates to a super fun machine for the street, autocross, or whatever you choose. Oh and this car has power steering, ac, and a catalytic converter so you can beat on it all day and still take the wife out to dinner after.
Attached Thumbnails IRP EFR7670 Low Boost Dyno Results-27368848_1661316140557905_1901621260921652869_o.jpg   IRP EFR7670 Low Boost Dyno Results-27021669_1661316193891233_2666534116332964294_o.jpg   IRP EFR7670 Low Boost Dyno Results-26961633_1661316233891229_2131409613515423868_o.jpg  

Last edited by IRPerformance; 01-26-18 at 09:19 AM.
IRPerformance is offline  
Old 01-26-18, 10:26 AM
  #2  
Moderator

iTrader: (13)
 
Johnny Kommavongsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,418
Received 133 Likes on 91 Posts
Nice. what is the difference between the ports on this engine and the port you did on prtrhahn engine?
Johnny Kommavongsa is offline  
Old 01-26-18, 05:04 PM
  #3  
Don't worry be happy...

iTrader: (1)
 
Montego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,845
Received 788 Likes on 463 Posts
Mighty impressive. From the graph it appears that at 3000RPMs the car is already at ~180RWHP. No need to downshift to pass a car... Me want
Montego is offline  
Old 01-28-18, 03:21 PM
  #4  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by Montego
Mighty impressive. From the graph it appears that at 3000RPMs the car is already at ~180RWHP. No need to downshift to pass a car... Me want
Its easy to build a car that puts down peak hp numbers. What's more difficult is to put together a well-sorted setup that performs well in a wide range of situations. Had a chance to put some street miles on this car and I can't get over how enjoyable it is to drive. I'd be more than happy to build you a kit if you are interested.

Last edited by IRPerformance; 01-28-18 at 03:36 PM.
IRPerformance is offline  
Old 01-29-18, 12:31 PM
  #5  
Don't worry be happy...

iTrader: (1)
 
Montego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,845
Received 788 Likes on 463 Posts
Originally Posted by IRPerformance
I'd be more than happy to build you a kit if you are interested.
Oh man don't tempt me! I just spend a pretty penny getting my turbo rebuilt and manifold reinforced so there is no way the wife is green lighting it. I wish I would had seen this 1.5 months ago

Originally Posted by IRPerformance
Its easy to build a car that puts down peak hp numbers. What's more difficult is to put together a well-sorted setup that performs well in a wide range of situations. Had a chance to put some street miles on this car and I can't get over how enjoyable it is to drive.
For anyone that is thinking about this kit, look at the dyno that he posted. Compare it to others and see the area under the curve as well at the HP in the lower RPMs. This thing is ******* badass....
Montego is offline  
Old 01-29-18, 02:37 PM
  #6  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by Montego
Oh man don't tempt me! I just spend a pretty penny getting my turbo rebuilt and manifold reinforced so there is no way the wife is green lighting it. I wish I would had seen this 1.5 months ago



For anyone that is thinking about this kit, look at the dyno that he posted. Compare it to others and see the area under the curve as well at the HP in the lower RPMs. This thing is ******* badass....
Haha you could always sell your current kit
IRPerformance is offline  
Old 01-29-18, 02:47 PM
  #7  
Moderator

iTrader: (13)
 
Johnny Kommavongsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,418
Received 133 Likes on 91 Posts
I tried to sell my kit earlier so that i can buy this kit.
Johnny Kommavongsa is offline  
Old 01-29-18, 04:40 PM
  #8  
Full Member

 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 233
Received 36 Likes on 21 Posts
If I plug the numbers into matchbot for 4000rpm (250whp @ 13psi) ..... you have to have 125% VE to get that much wheel power (assuming 40hp drivetrain loss) . Can someone explain how that is possible ?

Compare with the14psi log , same turbo ,on a dyno dynamics :
https://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo...esuts-1088491/

Almost looks like the rpms are wrong ..... maybe not done at 1:1 gear ratio ...

Last edited by Brettus; 01-29-18 at 05:12 PM.
Brettus is offline  
Old 01-29-18, 11:22 PM
  #9  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Havoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Australia - Perth
Posts: 1,326
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Matchbot is for piston engine VE's. Not rotary engine's
Havoc is offline  
Old 01-30-18, 12:03 AM
  #10  
Full Member

 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 233
Received 36 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Havoc
Matchbot is for piston engine VE's. Not rotary engine's
Ve is Ve no matter what engine it is . The parameter that changes for a rotary is BSFC and I was being generous with that even .
Brettus is offline  
Old 01-30-18, 01:12 AM
  #11  
Instrument Of G0D.


iTrader: (1)
 
WANKfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,540
Received 963 Likes on 727 Posts
Its still more realistic than the dyno put out by a certain other high profile vendor on here for the same turbo,, 400+ at 12psi or something. Im guessing its just optimistic dyno figures, either way though, both look like absolutely killer setups.

I'm not sure how far you should trust the matchbot orr even the compressor maps anyway. I pretty much chose the 8374 over the 7670 because the former appeared to be more efficient at lower boost than the latter, ,, these dyno results coming out now kind of contradict that.

Last edited by WANKfactor; 01-30-18 at 01:16 AM.
WANKfactor is offline  
Old 01-30-18, 10:31 AM
  #12  
10000 RPM Lane

iTrader: (2)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: on the rev limiter
Posts: 2,450
Received 842 Likes on 575 Posts
instead of questioning the results perhaps the theory should instead be questioned :p
TeamRX8 is offline  
Old 01-30-18, 12:31 PM
  #13  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,209
Received 762 Likes on 505 Posts
WANKfactor
Its still more realistic than the dyno put out by a certain other high profile vendor on here for the same turbo,, 400+ at 12psi or something. Im guessing its just optimistic dyno figures, either way though, both look like absolutely killer setups.


May be an optimistic dyno, but that is ALSO a bridge ported motor.

That is going to make the same power at a lower boost than a stock or street port engine on a given turbo and not be able to make more power then the stock port or street port engine when maxing out the turbo flow- that is how physics work.

If you take a 300hp NA rotary and put a turbo that maxes flow at 300hp you are going to have a 300hp turbo rotary and at peak power you will have no boost.

https://www.rx7club.com/time-slips-d...5-psi-1122867/



BLUE TII is offline  
Old 01-30-18, 02:04 PM
  #14  
Full Member

 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 233
Received 36 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
instead of questioning the results perhaps the theory should instead be questioned :p
That would be a good point if we were talking about a 'theory'.
Brettus is offline  
Old 01-30-18, 03:06 PM
  #15  
Full Member

 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 233
Received 36 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by WANKfactor
Its still more realistic than the dyno put out by a certain other high profile vendor on here for the same turbo,, 400+ at 12psi or something. Im guessing its just optimistic dyno figures, either way though, both look like absolutely killer setups.
t.
400+ at 12.5psi with a half bridge and E85 on a dynojet = maybe 340 for a stockport on pumpgas and a dyno dynamics . I have more issue with the above dyno than the 400 one.
Brettus is offline  
Old 01-30-18, 04:27 PM
  #16  
Instrument Of G0D.


iTrader: (1)
 
WANKfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,540
Received 963 Likes on 727 Posts
Ok my bad. Didnt see the part where it said "half bridge"
Still I'm very impressed with the low boost output on these turbos now. More efficient than i thought.
Stupid question; How far wrong would it be to take the estimated N/A power output of a given engine/port and multiply it by the pressure ratio for an estimated turbo output? Assuming everything is pretty efficient?
WANKfactor is offline  
Old 01-31-18, 10:35 AM
  #17  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
The main point of a dyno is an instrument for tuning. Comparing dyno numbers of different cars between different dynos is not accurate. Each dyno reads differently depending on the type, calibration, and how the user operates it. Ours is always super consistent and the power numbers always correlate with the setup of the car being tuned. That being said, a Mustang dyno typically reads 12% lower than a Dynojet because of the way it measures power. Dyno Dynamics tend read even lower in my experience.
IRPerformance is offline  
Old 01-31-18, 01:32 PM
  #18  
Full Member

 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 233
Received 36 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by IRPerformance
a Mustang dyno typically reads 12% lower than a Dynojet because of the way it measures power. .
Exactly ... I have seen this , and that is why I'm questioning the numbers as they seem at odds with other results for that same turbo and dyno. Is there any chance the pull was done in 3rd instead of 4th ? The peak power rpm looks too low .....(by about 1000rpm)

Last edited by Brettus; 01-31-18 at 03:04 PM.
Brettus is offline  
Old 10-01-18, 03:41 PM
  #19  
RX7FD3S

iTrader: (3)
 
RX7LINK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Bay, North Cali.
Posts: 1,489
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
I've been eyeing this kit on the IRP website. Can I run this turbo kit with my current fuel setup? Currently i have 550 primaries and 1300 secondaries, Supra TT fuel pump, oem FPR, HKS Twin Power, managed by PowerFC+boost kit. What is the the power potential when i hit my limitations? Stock port 13brew engine.
RX7LINK is offline  
Old 10-01-18, 05:27 PM
  #20  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by RX7LINK
I've been eyeing this kit on the IRP website. Can I run this turbo kit with my current fuel setup? Currently i have 550 primaries and 1300 secondaries, Supra TT fuel pump, oem FPR, HKS Twin Power, managed by PowerFC+boost kit. What is the the power potential when i hit my limitations? Stock port 13brew engine.
Yes you can. However if the 1300s you have are modified stock 850s, I recommend you upgrade them to a more modern injector. We stopped running them many years ago because they had a high failure rate. We've had a bunch leak so we stopped installing them or tuning them. To me its not worth the risk. I recommend a FFE FD stepup kit with either ID or FIC injectors (bosch ev14 based). I can set you up with the fuel kit starting at around $700 depending on what injectors you prefer and it includes a regulator.The 7670 tops out around 400whp on a rotary with insane response. If you want something that hits a little harder, the 8374 is a good choice for 400+ with a small spool penalty.
IRPerformance is offline  
The following users liked this post:
RX7LINK (10-05-18)
Old 02-28-19, 09:37 AM
  #21  
1994 RX7

 
FredAllenBurge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carthage, Missouri
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much less power do you think this would have made on stock ports? (Trying to decide between this and the 8374 for my stock port motor.)
FredAllenBurge is offline  
Old 03-04-19, 10:29 AM
  #22  
Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by FredAllenBurge
How much less power do you think this would have made on stock ports? (Trying to decide between this and the 8374 for my stock port motor.)
About 15-20hp depending on port size. I will say the 8374 is a better choice if you want to approach and exceed 400 hp. The 7670 is a great replacement for twins without loosing response.
IRPerformance is offline  
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ItalynStylion
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
11-08-18 12:14 PM
GoodfellaFD3S
Time Slips and Dyno
160
08-22-06 12:23 PM
Roadracing7
Power FC Forum
10
12-18-01 03:30 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: IRP EFR7670 Low Boost Dyno Results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 PM.