RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/)
-   -   water temp reading difference - gauge vs power fc (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/water-temp-reading-difference-gauge-vs-power-fc-840220/)

RE-Mamamia 05-16-09 06:00 PM

water temp reading difference - gauge vs power fc
 
I noticed my apexi el2 water temp reading is always 5-8 degrees cooler than the reading from the power fc.

Which one is more accurate? Here is where i mounted the sensor for water temp gauge:

http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r...RX-7/photo.jpg

TheRxForSpeed 05-16-09 06:06 PM

Hopefully someone will chime in that knows more than I but I also have mine located there; I think the factory gauge's sensor is mounted on one of the irons so there should be a temperature difference. If I remember right that is about the same difference i have between the two sensors.

Not sure how accurate this is but just found this "The level sensor is in the top of the radiator. The sensor for the gauge is the little one in the rear iron. The sensor for the ECU is in the back of the waterpump. "

arghx 05-16-09 08:15 PM

^ that is correct

Sgtblue 05-16-09 08:17 PM

I believe the PFC gets it's readings from the OEM sensor behind the waterpump housing. My aftermarket gauge sensor is taken from the (former) TB coolant line hose and both generally agree within about 1 deg. C. ??

NissanConvert 05-16-09 10:10 PM

I think the difference in temperature shouldn't make much difference. But the ecu working on that information.

RE-Mamamia 05-17-09 03:01 AM

well, the water temp is important to me since i need to know when to pit in when it gets hot. I have been following the ECU but was just pretty surprise to find out that the temp varies up to 8 degrees...and to me, there is a big difference between 108 and 116!

Oliv 05-17-09 07:46 AM

I'd change the stock gauge for a new one and rely on it + PFC.

adam c 05-17-09 09:04 AM

To me, the filler neck is a very poor choice for a water temp sensor. There really isn't any flow of coolant there. The sensor should be in a place where the coolant circulates.

RE-Mamamia 05-18-09 11:36 AM


Originally Posted by adam c (Post 9215776)
To me, the filler neck is a very poor choice for a water temp sensor. There really isn't any flow of coolant there. The sensor should be in a place where the coolant circulates.

I think there are a good flow of coolant going through the filler neck but where would you recommend?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands