RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/)
-   -   testing the OEM knock sensor, shop manual info incomplete... help please. (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/testing-oem-knock-sensor-shop-manual-info-incomplete-help-please-577084/)

Howard Coleman 09-11-06 02:36 PM

testing the OEM knock sensor, shop manual info incomplete... help please.
 
i am really scratching my head reading and re-reading the shop manual on what should be a very simple test proceedure:

here's the manual:

Knock Sensor inspection (on vehicle)

1. connect voltmeter(-) terminal to the MEN terminal of the data link connector.
2. connect the data link connector terminals TEN and GND by using a jumper wire.
3. turn ign switch on.
4. lightly tap on the engine hanger with a hammer.
5. verify voltmeter indicator moves.
6. turn ign switch to off.

i get nothing on the voltmeter.... but doesn't the voltmeter positive lead need to be connected somewhere????

i have gone thru two knock sensors in a short period of time. any ideas?

thanks for any help.

howard coleman

foamfan 09-11-06 02:54 PM

IDEA: Knock sensors are usually Piezo-electric devices that produce voltage on a certain frequency range. It is unlikely that you can go through two of them over a short period of time. It is more likely that your voltmeter is not sensitive enough or you need to amplify the voltage produced by the sensor.

And Yes the Positive terminal of your voltmenter has to be connected.

Howard Coleman 09-11-06 03:52 PM

thanks for the help.

i run a power fc and a datalogit and do log knock routinely. in the last few weeks my knock readings have dropped to the default (1) reading which is the same as if the sensor was disconnected. there is a shielded wire around the sensor which communicates to ground thru the sensor body. a one prong connector situates between the sensor and the ecu. the shielded wire on both sides (not connected thru the plug) communicates w ground.

i did splice (soldered) part of the wire between the ecu and the connector and used aluminum foil to shield the spliced in wire. it shows continuity to ground. the first sensor ran fine for 500 miles and the second (i replaced only the sensor and it immediately worked) lasted around 150 miles.

i still need help as to where to place the positive lead from the voltmeter.

howard coleman

kuroi FD 09-11-06 03:56 PM

those suckers arent cheap either, are they oem? I would call the person you bought them from and see what they can do for you

DamonB 09-11-06 04:08 PM


Originally Posted by howard coleman

i still need help as to where to place the positive lead from the voltmeter.

howard coleman

It's got to be to the positive post of the battery.

Since the instructions say to read the negative side from the MEN terminal that must be the reference output from the knock sensor. That output must be with respect to ground since the instructions say to place the negative lead of the voltmeter there. Given that the positive lead must go to the positive terminal of the battery in order to create a potential in the circuit.

I think foamfan is right in that the knock sensor is going to produce some tiny reading so you'll most likely need a digital voltmeter to even notice it.

NewbernD 09-11-06 04:25 PM


Originally Posted by DamonB
so you'll most likely need a digital voltmeter to even notice it.

I would have guessed the opposite, that an analog meter would be better for identifying tiny pulses (unless you have an o-scope.) Most digital meters react too slowly to pick up momentary readings like these, but with a sweeping needle you can see it bump.

mad_7tist 09-11-06 04:43 PM

i would agree that you need a Good meter fluke etc something with some resolution/speed or a good old school analog you would use to set dwell etc.

i have never done this but i assumed that the knock sensor would output a + voltage as it is a piezoelectric item. so i would say the neg lead to the men terminal and the pos lead to the neg battery terminal

i would agree with damon about the pos terminal but the sensor is not a variable resistace. i thought all pizo devices output voltage when compressed or changed shape when voltge is applied...

Howard Coleman 09-11-06 06:53 PM

THANK YOU ALL for the guidence. you sort of confirm my suspicions that the other lead would be to the battery. it would seem the sensor should output positive voltage (the sensor body is grounded) so maybe to the neg side. i do have a fairly good digital multimeter so i should pick up a signal. i will post tomorrow as to my results.

thanks again,

howard coleman

EvilAreXeven 03-18-10 09:14 PM

Howard, I'm sorry to bring this back from the dead, but this thread is the closest I've gotten in search.

I'm currently trying to test my knock sensor, and the shop manual leaves a lot of gray area.

In which way did you test the sensor:

1) Positive probe to positive battery terminal, negative probe to MEN connector, jump 10 + GRND, hammer engine hanger.

or

2) Positive probe to MEN connector, negative probe to good ground, jump 10 + GRND, hammer engine hanger.

If you remember, could you please let me know which way you tested the knock sensor, and what types of values you saw?

Although the manual makes vague reference to option 1), I used the second option because connecting the negative probe to the MEN output didn't make much sense...however, I'm no expert, which is why I'm asking you.

DaleClark 03-18-10 09:38 PM

First off, the shop manual's test procedure will only work with a stock ECU I do believe. The PowerFC doesn't have a lot of the diag stuff the stock ECU does - for example, you can't pull engine codes and the like.

If you intend on rewiring the knock sensor, you need a shielded wire. Radio Shack has a shielded wire, it has a foil braid around it to reduce interference. The knock sensor puts out such a weak signal that any interference will show up as knock. Stock, the shield is grounded - that's part of how the shield works.

Dale

EvilAreXeven 03-18-10 09:42 PM

Thank you for that information, but more importantly, I'm looking for information on the testing procedure and values as the shop manual is very ambiguous in its description.

Speed of light 03-18-10 11:12 PM

When you check a pizo sensor, you need to use an AC voltmeter, on a low millivolt scale to see the sensor output. These sensors produce their highest output in their bandpass region, which is approx. 3-->4kHz, IIRC. It does not output a DC voltage, per se. That being said, the signal is usually superimposed on a DC bias--but you still need to use an AC scale to properly see the sensor output. Your best bet is to reference your DVM or VTVM to ground.

arghx 03-19-10 01:18 AM

1 Attachment(s)
https://www.rx7club.com/attachment.p...1&d=1268979482

that's from the 91 Technical data sheet for series 5 FC turbo cars. The FD technical data does not list a frequency range. The knock sensors are interchangeable between FC and FD.

ttmott 03-19-10 11:28 AM

A VOM is the minimum test to see if the sensor is even producing a signal. To understand what the sensor is really doing is to put an O- scope on it. With the scope you can see the duration and amplitude of the signal. The scope will also determine if the shield is doing it's job.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands