RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/)
-   -   External Wastegate on Stock Twins. For those who said it can't be done (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/external-wastegate-stock-twins-those-who-said-cant-done-1000553/)

Ball joint 06-04-12 02:35 PM

External Wastegate on Stock Twins. For those who said it can't be done
 
10 Attachment(s)
Ever since I maxed out the BNR's I've been looking for new ways to squeeze more power out of the twins. One of the problems I was running into was being able to hold high boost to redline, with the boost peaking at 21psi and trailing off to 18.5psi by redline. Me and another member made some conclusions about what could be causing this. One, restriction in the inlets to the turbine housings (especially the rear), two, Excessive manifold pressure is overcoming the factory wastegate and is effectively holding it open. The other member ported the turbine housings but still had the same issue with boost falling off. With the external gate I can now hold 21psi to redline.

Many users on this site have talked about the idea of running a external wastegate on the twins to overcome the common boost creep problem many owners have had with the twins. There are many posts with people asking about running a external with them usually being shot down and someone claiming "it can't be done". Well I'm here to tell you it can and how to do it.

The answer is in the pre-spool access door on the backside of the turbos. It is positioned so that with heavy porting it will have direct exhaust flow from the rear rotor and is in the path of the bleed off passage for the front rotor. This of course means that you will have to run non-sequential to do this.

1. Remove the pre-spool access door and cut a large hole in it. Plasma cutter worked best for me.

Attachment 758049


2. Weld a 90degree piece of 1.25" schedule 10 stainless pipe to the hole you just cut. Test fit exactly where you want to weld this beforehand. It's a very tight fit, measure twice and weld once.

Attachment 758050


This is what it should look like mounted to the turbos in the bay.

Attachment 758051


Next step in involves the stock exhaust manifold. In order to maximize flow to the wastegate a large section has to be cut out of the manifold. I knew someone with a Bridge Cutter that was able to cut out the section. The stock flapper has already been removed in this photo.

Attachment 758052


With the exhaust manifold ported the same needs to be done to the rear turbine housing. In this picture you can see the rear turbine housing to the left and the amount of material that is in front of the pre-spool hole.

Attachment 758053


This is what the rear turbine housing should look like after porting and is heavily ported compared to stock. This part took me about 3-4 hours and is definitely the hardest part of this job. This is also a good time to weld the stock wastegate flapper closed and fill the holes made by removing the pre-spool flapper and flapper in the exhaust manifold.

Attachment 758054


After porting is complete the exhaust will have a direct passage to the wastegate and much better flow to the rear turbine housing.

Attachment 758055


Mild porting can also be done to the front turbine housings inlet. Turbos assembled.

Attachment 758056


Throw it all together now and you have a external gate on the twins! Here are the pics of the gate from above and below the car.

Attachment 758057
Attachment 758058


I know I probably left out some important parts so feel free to ask questions.

RXtacy 06-04-12 03:13 PM

Very cool. Do you have a picture of the twins fully assembled with the wastegate prior to install?

Rx7aholic 06-04-12 03:14 PM

damn that's allot of work but great idea i hope it work for you.

Ball joint 06-04-12 04:41 PM


Originally Posted by RXtacy (Post 11112912)
Very cool. Do you have a picture of the twins fully assembled with the wastegate prior to install?

Sorry I don't.

cptpain 06-04-12 06:13 PM

How's the sound with that dumped gate?

Is there any improved spool with the large wategate as opposed to running the stock gates or is the difference unnoticable?

indio84 06-04-12 06:47 PM

very nice

theorie 06-04-12 07:16 PM

Very innovative. Certainly is A LOT of work though. Interested to see some numbers

bajaman 06-04-12 07:19 PM

Another verifiable rotory gury, for sure. Amazing amount of work, even more amazing thought put into the effort. Good job, sir.

DaleClark 06-04-12 08:25 PM

I think it's always been a case of "possible, but not without a lot of work". Kudos to pulling it off!

Is there any way you could route the wastegate's output back into the downpipe? Screamer pipes are fun for a day or two, that's just STUPID damn loud. Wonder if there's enough space around there to do it.

Have you driven the car with this setup? Any results?

Dale

ZE Power MX6 06-05-12 01:19 AM

Nice, interested to see some numbers.

Banzai-Racing 06-05-12 06:58 AM

I see a lot of work to add an external WG to the secondary turbo. What did you do with the internal WG and actualtor on the primary turbo? I can see the flapper arm in the install pics, did you end up reinstall the stock actuator? Weld the WG shut? Did you merge the front and rear exhaust flow some how so that they are booth controlled by the external WG?

Unless I am misreading something, I do not see how this is going to control boost on the primary turbo since it has an independent exhaust runner that is not going to be vented by the Tial WG.

Not trying to be critical, just a little confused by the write up.

RENESISFD 06-05-12 07:32 AM


Originally Posted by Banzai-Racing (Post 11113636)
I see a lot of work to add an external WG to the secondary turbo. What did you do with the internal WG and actualtor on the primary turbo? I can see the flapper arm in the install pics, did you end up reinstall the stock actuator? Weld the WG shut? Did you merge the front and rear exhaust flow some how so that they are booth controlled by the external WG?

Unless I am misreading something, I do not see how this is going to control boost on the primary turbo since it has an independent exhaust runner that is not going to be vented by the Tial WG.

Not trying to be critical, just a little confused by the write up.


Originally Posted by Ball joint (Post 11112878)

Next step in involves the stock exhaust manifold. In order to maximize flow to the wastegate a large section has to be cut out of the manifold. I knew someone with a Bridge Cutter that was able to cut out the section. The stock flapper has already been removed in this photo.

https://i.imgur.com/anEYTl.jpg




Banzai, In the above pic the stock manifold is cut increasing the exhaust flow to the external wastegate. If you look sideways through the manifold you can see the exhaust ports are connected even when the manifold is not modified.

Ball joint 06-05-12 07:49 AM


Originally Posted by Banzai-Racing (Post 11113636)
I see a lot of work to add an external WG to the secondary turbo. What did you do with the internal WG and actualtor on the primary turbo? I can see the flapper arm in the install pics, did you end up reinstall the stock actuator? Weld the WG shut? Did you merge the front and rear exhaust flow some how so that they are booth controlled by the external WG?

Unless I am misreading something, I do not see how this is going to control boost on the primary turbo since it has an independent exhaust runner that is not going to be vented by the Tial WG.

Not trying to be critical, just a little confused by the write up.

The stock actuator was removed and the stock wastegate was welded shut by simply welding the stock wastegate flapper arm in the closed position.

As for the front and rear exhaust flows, you have to remember the stock wastegate port is only in the front turbo and there is a passage in the stock exhaust manifold that links the front and rear rotors. From the factory the rear turbo bleeds off extra exhaust through the manifold and into the front turbo which contains that factory wastegate. My system works in the same way, but instead of the rear turbo bleeding extra exhaust to the front it now works in reverse, with the front turbo sending excess exhaust to the rear. This was my greatest concern when I decided to do this, as I'm reversing the excess flow inside the exhaust manifold.

I have tested the wastegate and it works flawlessly! Boost builds well and it seems to spool a little bit faster then before. The big advantage of this is that I'm now able to hold high boost (21psi) all the way to redline instead of it falling off to 18psi. When I get the time to tune I plan to turn the boost up even higher to see what these BNR's can truly do.

The wastegate with the screamer pipe is defiantly loud and just sounds nasty when it kicks on. There is room to route the exhaust back into the factory downpipe if I end up getting sick of it though.

RXtacy 06-05-12 09:19 AM

Any idea what your EGT's are?

Ball joint 06-05-12 09:41 AM


Originally Posted by RXtacy (Post 11113740)
Any idea what your EGT's are?

No. Down the road I'll install a dual EGT probe, but I'm in no hurry to rip everything back off the car.

Mrmatt3465 06-05-12 10:23 AM

Way cool and awesome job! It's too bad you cannot externally gate it while keeping them sequential though. What made you decide to keep the BNRs and attempt an external gate over say a modest sized single turbo? It just seems like an awful lot of work on the twins where it can be resolved with a nice single.

There's nothing wrong with being different though :)

Matt

tom94RX-7 06-05-12 10:52 AM

Cool good job, that will be nice to keep the boost up and not falling off like it always did.

Ball joint 06-05-12 10:52 AM


Originally Posted by Mrmatt3465 (Post 11113804)
Way cool and awesome job! It's too bad you cannot externally gate it while keeping them sequential though. What made you decide to keep the BNRs and attempt an external gate over say a modest sized single turbo? It just seems like an awful lot of work on the twins where it can be resolved with a nice single.

There's nothing wrong with being different though :)

Matt

I decided on BNR's because I always liked how non-sequential twins deliver their power very progressively. I've been in many single turbo cars and while they're fast many of them deliver the power like a off/on switch and just roast the tires as soon as the power comes on. I made 452whp before this mod and I got full traction at the high end of second gear and for all of third.

I wanted to install the external gate because the stock internal gate was causing boost to drop off from 21psi to 18psi by redline. This external gate will allow me to hold 21psi all the way redline as well as run more boost if I want.

I also love a challenge :)

Battle Cat 06-05-12 11:35 AM

this is superb, never thought some one would pull the trigger and do this.. im eagerly awaiting to see how it does with the tune and how the BNR's hold up..

great work.

-Jaime

Mr rx-7 tt 06-05-12 02:53 PM

The BNR's are capable of making 450 plus. At 19 psi we made 432 rwhp with the sequential set up with a hot engine. We were making 13.5 rwhp per lb of boost. If we ran up to 21.5 lbs we would have been right at 470 rwhp. It will be very interesting to see what these turbo's are capable of at higher boost levels. Good job as usual and thanks for the pics...

Ball joint 05-26-13 08:26 PM

Here's a video of the car on the dyno


XLR8 05-26-13 11:18 PM

Nothing but a big congratts here!! Great work on bringing the twins to another level!!

cptpain 05-27-13 12:37 AM

Wow, she sounds healthy!

care to share a graph?

Mps_hell 05-27-13 05:23 AM

Maybe I am silly but I am failing to see why you couldn't stay sequential????
I mean all you did really was port out a hole that was already there and blow a hole in a plate yes?

Ball joint 05-27-13 12:33 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by cptpain (Post 11478680)
Wow, she sounds healthy!

care to share a graph?

I don't have a graph from this run but I do have a graph from when I made 470whp 400tq on a dynapak two weeks ago. Just for clarification the prior BNR non-sequential record was set on a Dynapak at 425whp. On this graph/run I had ignition breakup at high RPM due to me getting greedy with spark plug gap. I regaped my plugs before I made the run you see in the video above which solved the problem as you can see.

Attachment 756914


Originally Posted by Mps_hell (Post 11478735)
Maybe I am silly but I am failing to see why you couldn't stay sequential????
I mean all you did really was port out a hole that was already there and blow a hole in a plate yes?

I chose to go non-sequential because the flapper doors limit the maximum power that can be made on the twins. The whole point of this build is to see how much power can be made using the stock frame turbos and using every exploit possible to extract that power.

As for "all you did really was port out a hole that was already there and blow a hole in a plate yes?" I think this doesn't give credence to the amount of time, work, and planning that went into doing this. This mod is something that has been talked about on this forum for over ten years with no one finding out a way to do it. Without this mod you cannot hold more then 18psi to redline and if you're running a wide open 3" exhaust you will also be dealing with boost creep problems at around 15psi.

If you don't understand the work that was done above then either you didn't read what I wrote, or you haven't been around the RX-7 world long enough do understand the problems that this fixes and the potential for more power it brings.

Mps_hell 05-27-13 01:51 PM

Wasn't ment to sound that way. Not dissin your work I think it's very good and will save money, I just couldn't see why you said they couldn't be sequential anymore after this mod. Sounded like if I was to proform this I had to go non sequential. Also there is more to this mod then just holding more then 18 psi. Cheap Dead internal wast gate repair. I like to try and keep my car as "stock"as I can if I can kill off the internal east gate and still stay sequential I will more than likely have a crack at it

Ball joint 05-27-13 04:48 PM


Originally Posted by Mps_hell (Post 11479032)
Wasn't ment to sound that way. Not dissin your work I think it's very good and will save money, I just couldn't see why you said they couldn't be sequential anymore after this mod. Sounded like if I was to proform this I had to go non sequential. Also there is more to this mod then just holding more then 18 psi. Cheap Dead internal wast gate repair. I like to try and keep my car as "stock"as I can if I can kill off the internal east gate and still stay sequential I will more than likely have a crack at it

It's all good and thanks for the compliments, I guess I took it the wrong way as well.

After thinking about, you might be able to do it, but you would have to remove the pre-spool actuator door and you could keep the main door in place that diverts most of the exhaust to the front turbo. Problem would be that without the pre-spool actuator and assembly in place you would have a longer transition between both turbos having full boost. It's a very interesting idea I'm going to have to think about.

cptpain 05-27-13 05:24 PM


Originally Posted by Ball joint (Post 11478967)
I don't have a graph from this run but I do have a graph from when I made 470whp 400tq on a dynapak two weeks ago. Just for clarification the prior BNR non-sequential record was set on a Dynapak at 425whp. On this graph/run I had ignition breakup at high RPM due to me getting greedy with spark plug gap. I regaped my plugs before I made the run you see in the video above which solved the problem as you can see.

https://i.imgur.com/fdTOwwgl.jpg



I chose to go non-sequential because the flapper doors limit the maximum power that can be made on the twins. The whole point of this build is to see how much power can be made using the stock frame turbos and using every exploit possible to extract that power.

As for "all you did really was port out a hole that was already there and blow a hole in a plate yes?" I think this doesn't give credence to the amount of time, work, and planning that went into doing this. This mod is something that has been talked about on this forum for over ten years with no one finding out a way to do it. Without this mod you cannot hold more then 18psi to redline and if you're running a wide open 3" exhaust you will also be dealing with boost creep problems at around 15psi.

If you don't understand the work that was done above then either you didn't read what I wrote, or you haven't been around the RX-7 world long enough do understand the problems that this fixes and the potential for more power it brings.

Thats a nice graph. Very progresssive.

What do you use the car for if I may ask; Drag, Road Course etc etc?

Mps_hell 05-27-13 06:18 PM

I have doubts to whether or not the pre spool door is needed on the stock system at all, well at lest on my s8 1st turbo is spooling from the Minute the car is started and all the boost is getting dumped till the stock valve closes . That doesn't seem to be till 2600rpm. Might be something messed up in my car

Ball joint 05-27-13 07:51 PM


Originally Posted by cptpain (Post 11479181)
Thats a nice graph. Very progresssive.

What do you use the car for if I may ask; Drag, Road Course etc etc?

Thanks for the compliments! It's one of the reasons's why I've always liked non-sequential twins, the lag is really bad, but the power is delivered very progressively which allows for the car to have full traction in third gear. I've been in single turbo car's that make less power but rip tire in third because of how the power comes on all within 500rpm. Second gear is still usable but it rips the tires loose pretty bad.

I use the car primarily as just a street car as it's more a experiment for me. I like pushing limits and doing what others say can't be done. Currently this setup is not viable long term as I'm sure my exhaust manifold absolute pressures are through the roof! That's why the torque is so high.

I still want to try to hit 500whp on the twins, might blow the motor trying, but knowing it can be done is worth it.

OverEzzz 05-28-13 03:14 PM

I would love to see this mod in a more detailed how-to guide. Good luck in hitting 500.

Lock & Load 05-31-13 03:18 AM

Great effort keep us posted :icon_tup:

FD_virus85 05-31-13 04:43 AM

"the lag is really bad, but the power is delivered very progressively which allows for the car to have full traction in third gear"

That was my two weeks thoughts since i got the non -bnr 3's, lag is there but it's much better power delivery, power comes just enough for high RPM's to take care the rest of the power
on the sequential twins at third gear my car squeeks then gets the traction after (short period of sudden power then just dies off)

Even for track u get better corner on these u get to really step on it like non turbo LOL when i had sequential twins every corner i had to worry about sudden power delivery... somewhere in my mind
Also u don't hear your bov million times when driving long period of time XXXX these bov kicking on me everytime u let go the gas you wanna plug your ears after 3 hours of driving, on these non-s bnr's at second gear u gotta really step on it to hear your bov!!

I have some questions..
How are the lags and power deliver after all the work, respect on the numbers and work!

cloead 07-16-13 07:33 AM

THIS IS SOME CRAZY STUFFc

Grant M 07-23-13 11:44 PM

Any results on this yet?

edgars95rx7 08-06-13 01:12 AM

You are my hero ball joint. great job on the mod

Grant M 03-19-16 01:16 PM

Did you ever make 500hp?

Ball joint 09-03-16 06:05 PM


Originally Posted by Grant M (Post 12041171)
Did you ever make 500hp?

No, never had the will to push it that far as the EGT's are high and I set the record; so I was planning on finally going single. That was until some Australian's decided that BNR's are crap and they can do better with hybrid twins. So I guess I'm in a new dick measuring contest.

Zepticon 09-03-16 07:28 PM


Originally Posted by Ball joint (Post 12103186)
No, never had the will to push it that far as the EGT's are high and I set the record; so I was planning on finally going single. That was until some Australian's decided that BNR's are crap and they can do better with hybrid twins. So I guess I'm in a new dick measuring contest.

Only guy i have seen dissing the BNRs are the guy selling what he calls SP twins that he says he developed together with Hitachi?

DC5Daniel 09-03-16 08:18 PM


Originally Posted by Zepticon
Only guy i have seen dissing the BNRs are the guy selling what he calls SP twins that he says he developed together with Hitachi?

Ding ding ding

Zepticon 09-04-16 02:14 PM


Originally Posted by DC5Daniel (Post 12103211)
Ding ding ding

I think that if you have to talk down a competitors (very good) product to be able to make your own look good, you dont have much of a product yourself. I was considering getting the SP twins, but when i asked about them i got a lot of hubris, which does not convince me. So im going with BNRs when i get to that :)

Flybye 09-13-16 07:13 PM

Buy old manifolds, modify, make a group buy, just sayin. ;)

Anyways nice job!

kensin 10-17-16 06:59 AM

I'll send you my manifold and money lol

Fritz Flynn 10-17-16 12:13 PM

I love the innovation :)

However IMO you just ruined the only two advantages (internal wastegate and sequential) the twins have LOL

Wouldn't a t78 make about the same power with a similar curve at 15 to 17 psi?

borisf 10-17-16 03:48 PM

This is great. What size wastegates did you end up using? (sorry if i missed it).

I ran an External Gate on m 05 STi many years ago and yes, although it was loud (didnt have it plumbed back in the exhaust), the power delivery and boost control/ was much much better. Thats on one puny sized turbo.

The install is definitely not without its challenges from the pics, but still awesome work.

SakeBomb Garage 11-04-16 03:46 PM


Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn (Post 12115973)
I love the innovation :)

However IMO you just ruined the only two advantages (internal wastegate and sequential) the twins have LOL

Wouldn't a t78 make about the same power with a similar curve at 15 to 17 psi?

When I first read the thread I was hoping it would be a solution for an external gate on sequential twins. Non-Sec twins have all of the disadvantages (IMO) of sequential twins (huge lump of glowing iron on the side of the motor and compromised exhaust flow paths) and few advantages besides cost. It's cool to see someone innovating though! :icon_tup:

RX7Zamboni 11-05-16 12:45 AM

Someone's gata figure out how to do this but stay sequential

Flybye 11-05-16 05:39 AM

Hey BJ, have you ever compared the 280hp fd exhaust manifold with the older ones to see if the potential for more flow is there?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands