Difference between light and re-enforced FD wheels
I am attempting to sell a set of two FD wheels with M/T drag tires on them. One potential buyer is asking me if they are the light weight or the re-enforced version of the FD wheels.
They came off of a late build 94. Are there any markings or visual differences that I could use to decipher which version I have? |
The re inforced wheels spokes are about 2.25" wide right where they meet the rim.
The non reinforced ones are about 2" wide where it meets the rim. |
how much are you wanting for them?
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by cozmo kraemer
I am attempting to sell a set of two FD wheels with M/T drag tires on them. One potential buyer is asking me if they are the light weight or the re-enforced version of the FD wheels.
They came off of a late build 94. Are there any markings or visual differences that I could use to decipher which version I have? |
I believe only the '93s had the light weight wheels - they changed that in '94 when they saw the cracking problems.
Dale |
I am wanting $250 plus shipping...but best offer so far is $250 shipped
|
Thank you very much for the info guys!
That is all I needed to know!! |
Originally Posted by DaleClark
(Post 5632394)
I believe only the '93s had the light weight wheels - they changed that in '94 when they saw the cracking problems.
Dale I know this is an old thread but at least I'm searching and not starting a new thread. ;) Does anyone have any verification that the quoted statement is 100% true? And how common is this cracking problem? |
My FD was built in 1992 (I bought it new in March 1993) and it came with the "reinforced" wheels. After I damaged one late in 1993, the "new" replacement wheel was a "lightweight" one. I'm more inclined to think that Mazda had two interchangable sources for wheels.
|
Originally Posted by DaveW
(Post 7263727)
My FD was built in 1992 (I bought it new in March 1993) and it came with the "reinforced" wheels. After I damaged one late in 1993, the "new" replacement wheel was a "lightweight" one. I'm more inclined to think that Mazda had two interchangable sources for wheels.
|
Originally Posted by DaveW
(Post 7263727)
My FD was built in 1992 (I bought it new in March 1993) and it came with the "reinforced" wheels. After I damaged one late in 1993, the "new" replacement wheel was a "lightweight" one. I'm more inclined to think that Mazda had two interchangable sources for wheels.
Geez. I was off by a year - I meant it was built in 1991, and I bought it in March 1992. |
Originally Posted by DaveW
(Post 7263727)
My FD was built in 1992 (I bought it new in March 1993) and it came with the "reinforced" wheels. After I damaged one late in 1993, the "new" replacement wheel was a "lightweight" one. I'm more inclined to think that Mazda had two interchangable sources for wheels.
Personally I don't think it's a very big deal - just inspect them carefully before buying and always inspect them. Dave |
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
(Post 7264068)
... but Mazda clearly didn't consider them to be perfectly equal. That's because I've not yet seen or heard of a car coming from Mazda with mixed set.
Dave |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands