RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/)
-   -   Cold Air intake? (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/cold-air-intake-227386/)

dlambert 10-03-03 11:41 AM

i run a rx6 and cut inlet side of m2 intake off and welded on new piece set up for single inlet used filter that came with apexe turbo it is a very clean set up.also have port for blow off valve it is a great set up

airborne 10-03-03 05:06 PM

has anyone thought about venting the hood just above the intake with a pettit type system. or maybe boxing the intakes and sealing it against the hood so you can only draw air through the hood vents? there's very little room over there to work with. I've been thinking about making a box and sealing it against the plastic fender liner and venting that. saw a setup like that on some other car.

rynberg 10-03-03 06:46 PM


Originally posted by airborne
has anyone thought about venting the hood just above the intake with a pettit type system. or maybe boxing the intakes and sealing it against the hood so you can only draw air through the hood vents?
A typical vented hood like the Mazdaspeed has the vents oriented/placed such that they draw air out of the engine compartment, not suck it in -- which would be bad for the aerodynamics IMO.

teamstealth 10-03-03 07:39 PM

well, if you had one specially designed to suck in air directly and specifically into the intake, aerodynamics wouldnt suffer....would look a little fugly if there was only one huge hole on the passenger side though. :)

-Zach

teamstealth 10-03-03 07:43 PM

i was reading the earlier posts on cold air intakes and ram air and whatnot....and MY $.02 on that whole subject, is that even though cold air makes a difference in power (as demonstrated by zerobanger), the biggest advantage they have over the stock airbox is less restriction. I think in the long run u gain more horsepower from opening up the intake tract than from dropping the intake temps by getting colder air.

-Zach

rynberg 10-03-03 07:55 PM


Originally posted by teamstealth
....and MY $.02 on that whole subject, is that even though cold air makes a difference in power (as demonstrated by zerobanger), the biggest advantage they have over the stock airbox is less restriction. I think in the long run u gain more horsepower from opening up the intake tract than from dropping the intake temps by getting colder air.


That's a common misconception. The coldest intake air you will ever get is with the stock box (or Racing Beat or PFS setups). The "cold-air" intakes actually draw hotter air in than the stock (or RB or PFS) setup. They are named "cold air" because they are certainly better than an open intake.

teamstealth 10-03-03 08:00 PM

sssooo am i right or wrong on the higher flowing advantages? :)

ZeroBanger 10-03-03 08:05 PM


Originally posted by teamstealth
sssooo am i right or wrong on the higher flowing advantages? :)
well, colder air is more dense, so what do you want less air that is more efficient or more are that is less efficient?

I'm slowly learning the secret of how to enjoy the FD (Drive the fucking thing and forget about all these stupid things that have no real answers).

:eek:

teamstealth 10-03-03 08:07 PM

AMEN! that would be one helluva equation to figure out...more inefficient air or less efficient air....nebody good @ algebra and calc? lol

teamstealth 10-03-03 08:08 PM

and when u think about it, these senseless arguments could all be ended with the simple acceptance of the phrase "to each his own!"


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands