RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/)
-   -   Catalytic Converter: Suggestions (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/catalytic-converter-suggestions-1117974/)

MK3Brent 08-23-17 10:17 AM

Catalytic Converter: Suggestions
 
Hey guys,
I've been driving around now for years with a full 3" downpipe, no cat, and Tanabe touring exhaust.
Obviously, the car overboosts if you let it. I don't drive the car very hard, as I just enjoy it as it is without romping on it.

However, I would like to protect the engine and be able to boost safely without going too much more overboard with modifications. (Injectors are stock, and I have a 255 lph walbro pump.)

Are there some suggestions for a 3" cat that people have had experience using that will limit the flow to prevent over boost?

Thanks,

Houstonderk 08-23-17 10:41 AM

Why not just upgrade the wastegate to stop the overboosting...

evo_koa 08-23-17 10:51 AM

I have the Bonez hi flow cat from rx7.com. It is a high quality cat that should solve your over boost issues.

DaleClark 08-23-17 01:08 PM

If you are only wanting to get the boost under control, you really should port the wastegate. Also, if you are using the factory boost control solenoids, they will run away with boost a lot of times, an aftermarket controller or a better valve with PowerFC control goes a long way.

You could also experiment with restrictor plates.

Most high-flow cats are designed to flow well, they shouldn't choke down the car that much if designed right. You should really look at one for passing emissions or reducing exhaust stink. Otherwise it's a lot of money for what you are looking to accomplish.

Dale

MK3Brent 08-23-17 03:27 PM

Thanks for the replies, friends.

I am aware of the possibilities of porting the WG, but I was trying to avoid removing the turbos to do that.

I think I'll look into the hi-flow cat option as well as the solenoid function.

DaleClark 08-23-17 04:08 PM

Oh, I was going to give recommendations. The Bonez cat from Rotary Performance is really nice and does well, from what I understand it will pass emissions. If you want to go up a notch in quality, the SMB cat from Australia is exceptional. I have been running one for 10 years with no problems, it's super well built and hasn't been run with an air pump. It's pricey right now but is amazing. When I bought it the Australian dollar was weak and I got it for like $450 shipped or something.

Dale

Sgtblue 08-23-17 04:56 PM


Originally Posted by Houstonderk (Post 12210457)
Why not just upgrade the wastegate to stop the overboosting...

Because removing the DP and turbos with the engine in the car...then doing the porting is a huge pita compared to adding a cat? Not to mention the risk of breaking studs or having to buy expensive gaskets? Running with a midpipe makes the car stink? And he might like the change in sound? :)

Another vote for BONEZ. I don't have anything to compare it too, but that's just it...it was in the car 15 years ago (~ 80k ago) when I bought it and it's STILL going strong. Most of that was without an AP. All stainless, good thick flanges and seems to flow well.

MOBEONER 08-23-17 06:57 PM

install high flow cat and see what happens, if it still over boosts then get a racing beat dual tip and try that..

bajaman 08-23-17 08:36 PM

Pettit 3" stainless high flow cat is hard to beat.


http://shop.pettitracing.com/ss-hi-f...-p-120068.html

almcbs 08-23-17 08:48 PM

I have a bonez cat on my car for about a little over a year now and for some reason the fumes still smell pretty bad especially when coming to a stop.
I want to go with a straight midpipe and would be up for trading if i didnt need this cat to pass inspection.

btw how does your car sound with a midpipe? I have the same exhaust set up.

MK3Brent 08-24-17 07:25 AM


Originally Posted by bajaman (Post 12210603)
Pettit 3" stainless high flow cat is hard to beat.


SS Hi-Flow Catalytic Converter RX7

Hmm, interesting.
I'll have to crawl under the car again and see how the Tanabe is again.
I wonder if this Pettit system can literally just bolt in, and I replace the mid-pipe area.

That would be super convenient.

MK3Brent 08-24-17 07:28 AM

3 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by almcbs (Post 12210608)
btw how does your car sound with a midpipe? I have the same exhaust set up.

Kinda like... BBRRRR BRRR BRRRRRRR BRRRRR.... :lol:

Nah, it's a very subdued tone/note which is a joy after years of riding around in open exhaust 2JZ supras. I love the Tanabe exhaust. In my opinion it's quiet, but has a good tone when you open it up a little with the throttle. Let me put it this way, it's quiet enough to still clearly hear the stock BOV even at around 1-2psi of boost. Doesn't drone... just all around perfect for me.

(Added some pics.)

almcbs 08-24-17 07:38 AM


Originally Posted by MK3Brent
Hmm, interesting.
I'll have to crawl under the car again and see how the Tanabe is again.
I wonder if this Pettit system can literally just bolt in, and I replace the mid-pipe area.

That would be super convenient.

Yes it’ll bolt right up between the midpipe and catback.


Originally Posted by MK3Brent
Kinda like... BBRRRR BRRR BRRRRRRR BRRRRR.... :lol:

Nah, it's a very subdued tone/note which is a joy after years of riding around in open exhaust 2JZ supras. I love the Tanabe exhaust. In my opinion it's quiet, but has a good tone when you open it up a little with the throttle. Let me put it this way, it's quiet enough to still clearly hear the stock BOV even at around 1-2psi of boost. Doesn't drone... just all around perfect for me.

I ageee! Exact reason why I bought this exhaust. Glad to head it’s still relatively quiet with a midpipe

MK3Brent 08-24-17 08:37 AM


Originally Posted by almcbs (Post 12210703)
Yes it’ll bolt right up between the midpipe and catback.



I ageee! Exact reason why I bought this exhaust. Glad to head it’s still relatively quiet with a midpipe

Thanks for the feedback.
I'll confirm everything under the car, then probably order that piece.
As with all my threads, I'll make sure to post my results later for anyone else looking/searching for similar issues.

BLUE TII 08-24-17 01:14 PM

On my FD I bought a used resonated mid pipe and it had boost creep even when bypassing the stock boost "control" with MBCs.

I put in a reducer plate between the midpipe and the catback that controlled the boost creep.

Then I bought a used 3" SMB catted and resonated mid pipe and I really enjoyed the lack of hydrocarbon stink/sting and the reduced noise with a nice deep sound and it also controlled boost creep to 10psi with stock intake no problems (No reducer plate required).

arghx 08-25-17 07:47 AM

I don't understand the point of a restricter plate when you can just put a cat in there and lose the smell. It's probably not that big of a difference in restriction. I suppose you don't have to be concerned about burning up a cat if you don't have one but yeah having to deal with the smell gets old after a while.

MK3Brent 08-25-17 07:54 AM


Originally Posted by arghx (Post 12210980)
I don't understand the point of a restricter plate when you can just put a cat in there and lose the smell. It's probably not that big of a difference in restriction. I suppose you don't have to be concerned about burning up a cat if you don't have one but yeah having to deal with the smell gets old after a while.

Yes it does... Because most of the time I'm convincing myself "That's just the exhaust... you don't have a fuel leak... Nope.. No fuel leak at all..."

johnchabin 08-25-17 10:58 AM

I have the Bonez cat with air pump and just passed Colorado emissions.

GoodfellaFD3S 08-27-17 09:30 AM


Originally Posted by arghx (Post 12210980)
I don't understand the point of a restricter plate when you can just put a cat in there and lose the smell. It's probably not that big of a difference in restriction. I suppose you don't have to be concerned about burning up a cat if you don't have one but yeah having to deal with the smell gets old after a while.

A restrictor plate and a catalytic converter are pretty far apart in terms of restriction IMO. I'm talking a 2.75 inch restrictor in a 3 inch pipe...... cats have their place be it OEM or Bonez but not when your power goals exceed 400 rwhp. Losing the smell is great and all but not if you lose 50 rwhp along with it :)

I do think when the issue is stock twins and the small WG, just run a high flow cat and be done with it at the power levels those little guys allow. Full open exhaust on stock twin turbos is about as silly as running a bridgeported engine with the Hitachis.

I'd never consider installing one on my BB 95 car as I can't see any kind of cat working well on a nice single setup at 20 psi. I'll check out the SMB given Dale's experience for future builds etc, I know those crazy Aussies love their rotaries and make some good stuff :D

DaleClark 08-27-17 11:42 AM

Also, I think SMB has a "big" high flow cat, I seem to remember someone had that done. They can do some crazy custom stuff if you want.

The build quality and fit of my SMB cat is gorgeous.

Here's their page -
SMB Full Exhaust Systems-Mazda RX-7

Their website is garbage, though. Does have some pics of their products.

Dale

7krayziboi 08-27-17 03:43 PM

Anyone has any comment on
The vibrant cat?

http://www.vibrantperformance.com/ca...Path=1527_1326

IRPerformance 08-27-17 08:47 PM

I'd be interested in seeing your experience and data regarding why a high flow cat wouldn't work on a 400whp+ car. We have made 460 whp @ 20lbs (Mustang dyno numbers) through a Bonez high flow cat. The setup was limited by the s360 turbo as the motor and exhaust out flowed it. I've had multiple cars on twins boost creep with the high flow cat. Its not a significant restriction. Some people want to be environmentally responsible and emissions compliant. Nothing wrong with that.

Topolino 08-27-17 09:04 PM

Recently went with a Vibrant Ultra High output cat (p/n 7830 from the link above) on my FD in conjunction with an EFR 7670 turbo. Have mostly used a Bonez high flow cat the last 10 yrs or so with Efini twins, and wanted to give the Vibrant unit a test run. Interestingly enough, we weren't able to boost higher than 10-11 psi on the new turbo setup. Not sure if the Vibrant cat is the primary restriction or not (but obviously no boost creep with it, either).

Seems to knock down the odors well-enough. Not sure if it can pass a legitimate emissions test, though.

moehler 08-28-17 08:42 AM

FWIW, you can make power with a metallic sub cat -

https://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo...2-psi-1055993/

454 whp with an RT cat (they aren't around anymore I think).

If power / smell is your main concern, go with smb. If emissions is your goal, go for bonez or pettit.

IRPerformance 08-28-17 09:56 AM

1 Attachment(s)
461 whp/372 tq with our ported and studded motor, S360 single turbo kit, Bonez high flow cat, and Racing Beat catback. These numbers would equate to about 530hp on a Dynojet factoring in the 15% difference commonly found. The cat is not the issue.

MK3Brent 08-28-17 10:00 AM


Originally Posted by IRPerformance (Post 12211659)
461 whp/372 tq with our ported and studded motor, S360 single turbo kit, Bonez high flow cat, and Racing Beat catback. These numbers would equate to about 530hp on a Dynojet factoring in the 15% difference commonly found. The cat is not the issue.

Definitely not the original direction intended for this thread, but I am more than happy to help with education.

Wouldn't it be logical to say that w/o the cat, the numbers you posted could only be improved?
It would be interesting to see two back to back runs w/ and w/o the cat to show no difference at all.

7_rocket 08-28-17 10:02 AM

Does the Bonez not reduce/eliminate most of the smell? I was thinking about going with the Bonez this fall because my car stinks (midpipe)

moehler 08-28-17 10:35 AM


Originally Posted by MK3Brent (Post 12211660)
Definitely not the original direction intended for this thread, but I am more than happy to help with education.

Wouldn't it be logical to say that w/o the cat, the numbers you posted could only be improved?
It would be interesting to see two back to back runs w/ and w/o the cat to show no difference at all.

I'm sure the cat reduces power over a midpipe. The point is that if want a cat (for smell, etc.) that you can still make good power with them.

moehler 08-28-17 10:36 AM


Originally Posted by 7_rocket (Post 12211662)
Does the Bonez not reduce/eliminate most of the smell? I was thinking about going with the Bonez this fall because my car stinks (midpipe)

With an air pump, yes it eliminates 100% of the smell. W/o an air pump it eliminates most of the smell.

IRPerformance 08-28-17 01:06 PM


Originally Posted by MK3Brent (Post 12211660)
Definitely not the original direction intended for this thread, but I am more than happy to help with education.

Wouldn't it be logical to say that w/o the cat, the numbers you posted could only be improved?
It would be interesting to see two back to back runs w/ and w/o the cat to show no difference at all.

We have seen gains up to 20 hp at this power level by replacing the high flow cat with a midpipe and installing a better flowing exhaust than the Racing Beat, which is on the restrictive side vs some of the other offerings on the market. My point is you can still make solid numbers with a high flow cat, unlike some who post ignorant comments that you can't or shouldn't run a cat above a certain power level with no factual data. Some people are willing to give up a few hp to remain compliant or avoid the smell of running catless. I'm actually going to dyno another car within the next few weeks with a similar setup to the one who's dyno sheet I posted, but with a Magnaflow midpipe and a different exhaust. I'll post the results when I get them.

Hi Im Simon 12-13-17 10:06 AM


Originally Posted by Topolino (Post 12211567)
Recently went with a Vibrant Ultra High output cat (p/n 7830 from the link above) on my FD in conjunction with an EFR 7670 turbo. Have mostly used a Bonez high flow cat the last 10 yrs or so with Efini twins, and wanted to give the Vibrant unit a test run. Interestingly enough, we weren't able to boost higher than 10-11 psi on the new turbo setup. Not sure if the Vibrant cat is the primary restriction or not (but obviously no boost creep with it, either).

Seems to knock down the odors well-enough. Not sure if it can pass a legitimate emissions test, though.

Damn I thought the Vibrant cat would work well. I was looking into the Vibrant and HJS high flow cats. Anyone have any experience with HJS? The BMW and Porsche guys seem to love it and they are expensive, $600-1000 USD. I was mainly looking to get rid of the exhaust stink.

Universal catalysts - HJS Motorsport & Tuning

David Hayes 12-15-17 07:12 AM

1 Attachment(s)
I may be the only 3 rotor guy to run a cat on his/her car. Wanted to get rid of the stink so tried a few units. Settled on the MBS 100 cell unit and have had it installed for around 3 years:

High Flow Catalytic Converters - Mandrel Bending Solutions

Holds up to the heat of the rotary and eliminates a good bit of the stink. The 200 cell would eliminate more of the smell but I was worried about the restriction. And yes, you can make good power using a high-flow cat. Here is my dyno at 20 PSI:

https://www.rx7club.com/attachment.p...1&d=1513343447

Made 716 WHP and 570 ft. lbs.

GoodfellaFD3S 01-01-18 02:25 PM

David, do you have any pics of that converter installed on your setup? Assuming it's mounted pretty far downstream. The price sure as hell is right, and they seem to be nice and compact based on the pics on the site you linked to.

I may have to change my tune on this subject, once you stop learning and growing you may as well be six feet under, right? :rofl:

Happy New Year all :icon_tup:

David Hayes 01-01-18 04:27 PM

Hey Rich. I don't seem to have a pic handy but will take one - once the car comes back from the body shop. A lady with a 1994 Buick Roadmaster station wagon backed into me a few weeks ago and it crunched the left side of my bumper. :(

As I recall, the converter is placed forward in the midpipe, not back, but I'd need to verify this as the work was done some time ago. Has held up well and cleans up most of the rotary stink. Zach at Addicted and I think there is little to no impact of the converter on WHP. If you were to use a higher cell count one (say 400 or higher) you'd definitely get a restriction so it's a matter of using a lower cell count and giving up some of its cleaning abilities.

cib24 01-04-18 06:06 AM

People need to stop thinking that a cat is going to inhibit your ability to make power. High flow cats are not really that much of a restriction at all and like IR Performance says, at 450, 500, 600, whatever horsepower you aren't going to notice 10 or 20 hp. You probably wouldn't even notice that difference on a car with stock twins.

Manufacturers today have cars like the Corvette pushing 700+ horsepower and they have 2-4 cats. Set your exhaust up right and you will have plenty of flow and stay away from the headaches and poison to your lungs and the environment associated with running catless.

FEED AFFLUX v5 03-06-19 06:23 PM

Resurrecting an old thread here, but does anyone know if SMB are still in business?

The website either errors out or displays poorly whenever I try......

Thanks!

BLUE TII 03-06-19 10:45 PM


FEED AFFLUX v5
Resurrecting an old thread here, but does anyone know if SMB are still in business?

The website either errors out or displays poorly whenever I try......

Thanks!



I read on this site that Marcus Read who sells FD parts on Facebook has contacts with SMB and might be able to get batches of exhausts made.

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=527820134

I had to put my 3" resonated SMB highflow cat on my car to stop the boost creep with stock twins. It will run 12psi with the SMB high flow cat, but was creeping to 17psi with 4" downpipe back open exhaust. I tried a 3" resonated midpipe and even with that it was creeping to 15 or 16psi.

So anyone that says highflow cat flows well- not really; but it can be a useful restriction.

Problem is, I just looked at the SMB cat and its starting to lose its shape finally after running with no emissions (airpump). Don't know how much longer it will last with my abuse. It blows some big flames through it if I just wing it up to the 9,000rpm rev-linit which I was not expecting.

mikejokich 03-07-19 04:00 PM


Originally Posted by BLUE TII (Post 12334206)







I read on this site that Marcus Read who sells FD parts on Facebook has contacts with SMB and might be able to get batches of exhausts made.

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=527820134

I had to put my 3" resonated SMB highflow cat on my car to stop the boost creep with stock twins. It will run 12psi with the SMB high flow cat, but was creeping to 17psi with 4" downpipe back open exhaust. I tried a 3" resonated midpipe and even with that it was creeping to 15 or 16psi.

So anyone that says highflow cat flows well- not really; but it can be a useful restriction.

Problem is, I just looked at the SMB cat and its starting to lose its shape finally after running with no emissions (airpump). Don't know how much longer it will last with my abuse. It blows some big flames through it if I just wing it up to the 9,000rpm rev-linit which I was not expecting.

I had an SMB cat for several years too. They begin to melt at the higher temps of our rotary exhaust. The deformation you are seeing in the honeycomb is the melting. The air pump is not necessary for a metal cat and this lack of an air pump did not affect the SMB cat per say except for it may have slightly decreased the exhaust temp from the pump air introduced. Likely negligible. After my SMB melted, I bought the newer Vibrant GESI UHO cat. Higher melting temp, 300 cell rather than the SMB 100 cell, and rated for 500 hp. Simply better.
Mike


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands