3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Catalytic Converter: Suggestions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-17, 10:17 AM
  #1  
I'm only asking questions

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
MK3Brent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 498
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Catalytic Converter: Suggestions

Hey guys,
I've been driving around now for years with a full 3" downpipe, no cat, and Tanabe touring exhaust.
Obviously, the car overboosts if you let it. I don't drive the car very hard, as I just enjoy it as it is without romping on it.

However, I would like to protect the engine and be able to boost safely without going too much more overboard with modifications. (Injectors are stock, and I have a 255 lph walbro pump.)

Are there some suggestions for a 3" cat that people have had experience using that will limit the flow to prevent over boost?

Thanks,
Old 08-23-17, 10:41 AM
  #2  
My girl

iTrader: (3)
 
Houstonderk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Andrews AFB, MD
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Why not just upgrade the wastegate to stop the overboosting...
Old 08-23-17, 10:51 AM
  #3  
Martin S.

iTrader: (2)
 
evo_koa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Huntsville, Al
Posts: 1,400
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
I have the Bonez hi flow cat from rx7.com. It is a high quality cat that should solve your over boost issues.
Old 08-23-17, 01:08 PM
  #4  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,437 Likes on 1,508 Posts
If you are only wanting to get the boost under control, you really should port the wastegate. Also, if you are using the factory boost control solenoids, they will run away with boost a lot of times, an aftermarket controller or a better valve with PowerFC control goes a long way.

You could also experiment with restrictor plates.

Most high-flow cats are designed to flow well, they shouldn't choke down the car that much if designed right. You should really look at one for passing emissions or reducing exhaust stink. Otherwise it's a lot of money for what you are looking to accomplish.

Dale
Old 08-23-17, 03:27 PM
  #5  
I'm only asking questions

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
MK3Brent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 498
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Thanks for the replies, friends.

I am aware of the possibilities of porting the WG, but I was trying to avoid removing the turbos to do that.

I think I'll look into the hi-flow cat option as well as the solenoid function.
Old 08-23-17, 04:08 PM
  #6  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,437 Likes on 1,508 Posts
Oh, I was going to give recommendations. The Bonez cat from Rotary Performance is really nice and does well, from what I understand it will pass emissions. If you want to go up a notch in quality, the SMB cat from Australia is exceptional. I have been running one for 10 years with no problems, it's super well built and hasn't been run with an air pump. It's pricey right now but is amazing. When I bought it the Australian dollar was weak and I got it for like $450 shipped or something.

Dale
The following users liked this post:
MK3Brent (08-24-17)
Old 08-23-17, 04:56 PM
  #7  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,011
Received 862 Likes on 611 Posts
Originally Posted by Houstonderk
Why not just upgrade the wastegate to stop the overboosting...
Because removing the DP and turbos with the engine in the car...then doing the porting is a huge pita compared to adding a cat? Not to mention the risk of breaking studs or having to buy expensive gaskets? Running with a midpipe makes the car stink? And he might like the change in sound?

Another vote for BONEZ. I don't have anything to compare it too, but that's just it...it was in the car 15 years ago (~ 80k ago) when I bought it and it's STILL going strong. Most of that was without an AP. All stainless, good thick flanges and seems to flow well.

Last edited by Sgtblue; 08-23-17 at 06:27 PM.
Old 08-23-17, 06:57 PM
  #8  
It's finally reliable

iTrader: (18)
 
MOBEONER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NEW YORK CITY
Posts: 3,511
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
install high flow cat and see what happens, if it still over boosts then get a racing beat dual tip and try that..
The following users liked this post:
GoodfellaFD3S (08-27-17)
Old 08-23-17, 08:36 PM
  #9  
Constant threat

 
bajaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: near Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 4,952
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Pettit 3" stainless high flow cat is hard to beat.


http://shop.pettitracing.com/ss-hi-f...-p-120068.html
Old 08-23-17, 08:48 PM
  #10  
Full Member

iTrader: (1)
 
almcbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 101
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I have a bonez cat on my car for about a little over a year now and for some reason the fumes still smell pretty bad especially when coming to a stop.
I want to go with a straight midpipe and would be up for trading if i didnt need this cat to pass inspection.

btw how does your car sound with a midpipe? I have the same exhaust set up.
Old 08-24-17, 07:25 AM
  #11  
I'm only asking questions

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
MK3Brent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 498
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by bajaman
Pettit 3" stainless high flow cat is hard to beat.


SS Hi-Flow Catalytic Converter RX7
Hmm, interesting.
I'll have to crawl under the car again and see how the Tanabe is again.
I wonder if this Pettit system can literally just bolt in, and I replace the mid-pipe area.

That would be super convenient.
Old 08-24-17, 07:28 AM
  #12  
I'm only asking questions

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
MK3Brent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 498
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by almcbs
btw how does your car sound with a midpipe? I have the same exhaust set up.
Kinda like... BBRRRR BRRR BRRRRRRR BRRRRR....

Nah, it's a very subdued tone/note which is a joy after years of riding around in open exhaust 2JZ supras. I love the Tanabe exhaust. In my opinion it's quiet, but has a good tone when you open it up a little with the throttle. Let me put it this way, it's quiet enough to still clearly hear the stock BOV even at around 1-2psi of boost. Doesn't drone... just all around perfect for me.

(Added some pics.)
Attached Thumbnails Catalytic Converter: Suggestions-img_3966.jpg   Catalytic Converter: Suggestions-img_4076.jpg   Catalytic Converter: Suggestions-img_3854.jpg  

Last edited by MK3Brent; 08-24-17 at 07:37 AM.
Old 08-24-17, 07:38 AM
  #13  
Full Member

iTrader: (1)
 
almcbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 101
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by MK3Brent
Hmm, interesting.
I'll have to crawl under the car again and see how the Tanabe is again.
I wonder if this Pettit system can literally just bolt in, and I replace the mid-pipe area.

That would be super convenient.
Yes it’ll bolt right up between the midpipe and catback.

Originally Posted by MK3Brent
Kinda like... BBRRRR BRRR BRRRRRRR BRRRRR....

Nah, it's a very subdued tone/note which is a joy after years of riding around in open exhaust 2JZ supras. I love the Tanabe exhaust. In my opinion it's quiet, but has a good tone when you open it up a little with the throttle. Let me put it this way, it's quiet enough to still clearly hear the stock BOV even at around 1-2psi of boost. Doesn't drone... just all around perfect for me.
I ageee! Exact reason why I bought this exhaust. Glad to head it’s still relatively quiet with a midpipe
Old 08-24-17, 08:37 AM
  #14  
I'm only asking questions

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
MK3Brent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 498
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by almcbs
Yes it’ll bolt right up between the midpipe and catback.



I ageee! Exact reason why I bought this exhaust. Glad to head it’s still relatively quiet with a midpipe
Thanks for the feedback.
I'll confirm everything under the car, then probably order that piece.
As with all my threads, I'll make sure to post my results later for anyone else looking/searching for similar issues.
The following users liked this post:
bajaman (08-29-17)
Old 08-24-17, 01:14 PM
  #15  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,209
Received 762 Likes on 505 Posts
On my FD I bought a used resonated mid pipe and it had boost creep even when bypassing the stock boost "control" with MBCs.

I put in a reducer plate between the midpipe and the catback that controlled the boost creep.

Then I bought a used 3" SMB catted and resonated mid pipe and I really enjoyed the lack of hydrocarbon stink/sting and the reduced noise with a nice deep sound and it also controlled boost creep to 10psi with stock intake no problems (No reducer plate required).
Old 08-25-17, 07:47 AM
  #16  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
I don't understand the point of a restricter plate when you can just put a cat in there and lose the smell. It's probably not that big of a difference in restriction. I suppose you don't have to be concerned about burning up a cat if you don't have one but yeah having to deal with the smell gets old after a while.
Old 08-25-17, 07:54 AM
  #17  
I'm only asking questions

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
MK3Brent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 498
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by arghx
I don't understand the point of a restricter plate when you can just put a cat in there and lose the smell. It's probably not that big of a difference in restriction. I suppose you don't have to be concerned about burning up a cat if you don't have one but yeah having to deal with the smell gets old after a while.
Yes it does... Because most of the time I'm convincing myself "That's just the exhaust... you don't have a fuel leak... Nope.. No fuel leak at all..."
Old 08-25-17, 10:58 AM
  #18  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
johnchabin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Centennial, Colorado
Posts: 1,053
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I have the Bonez cat with air pump and just passed Colorado emissions.
Old 08-27-17, 09:30 AM
  #19  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,525
Received 538 Likes on 325 Posts
Originally Posted by arghx
I don't understand the point of a restricter plate when you can just put a cat in there and lose the smell. It's probably not that big of a difference in restriction. I suppose you don't have to be concerned about burning up a cat if you don't have one but yeah having to deal with the smell gets old after a while.
A restrictor plate and a catalytic converter are pretty far apart in terms of restriction IMO. I'm talking a 2.75 inch restrictor in a 3 inch pipe...... cats have their place be it OEM or Bonez but not when your power goals exceed 400 rwhp. Losing the smell is great and all but not if you lose 50 rwhp along with it

I do think when the issue is stock twins and the small WG, just run a high flow cat and be done with it at the power levels those little guys allow. Full open exhaust on stock twin turbos is about as silly as running a bridgeported engine with the Hitachis.

I'd never consider installing one on my BB 95 car as I can't see any kind of cat working well on a nice single setup at 20 psi. I'll check out the SMB given Dale's experience for future builds etc, I know those crazy Aussies love their rotaries and make some good stuff
Old 08-27-17, 11:42 AM
  #20  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,437 Likes on 1,508 Posts
Also, I think SMB has a "big" high flow cat, I seem to remember someone had that done. They can do some crazy custom stuff if you want.

The build quality and fit of my SMB cat is gorgeous.

Here's their page -
SMB Full Exhaust Systems-Mazda RX-7

Their website is garbage, though. Does have some pics of their products.

Dale
Old 08-27-17, 03:43 PM
  #21  
endless build

iTrader: (15)
 
7krayziboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Canada , Alberta
Posts: 1,139
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Anyone has any comment on
The vibrant cat?

http://www.vibrantperformance.com/ca...Path=1527_1326
Old 08-27-17, 08:47 PM
  #22  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
I'd be interested in seeing your experience and data regarding why a high flow cat wouldn't work on a 400whp+ car. We have made 460 whp @ 20lbs (Mustang dyno numbers) through a Bonez high flow cat. The setup was limited by the s360 turbo as the motor and exhaust out flowed it. I've had multiple cars on twins boost creep with the high flow cat. Its not a significant restriction. Some people want to be environmentally responsible and emissions compliant. Nothing wrong with that.
The following 3 users liked this post by IRPerformance:
Boost Lee (09-21-19), cib24 (01-04-18), grinn253 (09-20-21)
Old 08-27-17, 09:04 PM
  #23  
Life is Beautiful

iTrader: (2)
 
Topolino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ATX
Posts: 242
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
Recently went with a Vibrant Ultra High output cat (p/n 7830 from the link above) on my FD in conjunction with an EFR 7670 turbo. Have mostly used a Bonez high flow cat the last 10 yrs or so with Efini twins, and wanted to give the Vibrant unit a test run. Interestingly enough, we weren't able to boost higher than 10-11 psi on the new turbo setup. Not sure if the Vibrant cat is the primary restriction or not (but obviously no boost creep with it, either).

Seems to knock down the odors well-enough. Not sure if it can pass a legitimate emissions test, though.

Last edited by Topolino; 08-27-17 at 09:16 PM.
Old 08-28-17, 08:42 AM
  #24  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
FWIW, you can make power with a metallic sub cat -

https://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo...2-psi-1055993/

454 whp with an RT cat (they aren't around anymore I think).

If power / smell is your main concern, go with smb. If emissions is your goal, go for bonez or pettit.
Old 08-28-17, 09:56 AM
  #25  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
461 whp/372 tq with our ported and studded motor, S360 single turbo kit, Bonez high flow cat, and Racing Beat catback. These numbers would equate to about 530hp on a Dynojet factoring in the 15% difference commonly found. The cat is not the issue.
Attached Thumbnails Catalytic Converter: Suggestions-21198421_1424306354312155_2001665427_o.jpg  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 AM.