| Fritz Flynn |
11-07-05 06:08 PM |
I thought the article was good but not very accurate about some details. For instance one of the changes from the 93 to 94 cars was completely wrong regarding the sunroof. Also the protec r/salad dressing comment left the reader feeling it was as necessary as changing the oil.
I'm glad the FD is getting some attention but was hoping for a better article :(
I love how well the FD has retained its value and was hoping the writer would expand upon this but the emphasis was placed on depreciation not maintaining a good market value. For about 5 years this car has sold for the same price which I think is remarkable and should of been mentioned.
This won't be the last article featuring this car and I for one am still really REALLY pissed that the FD wasn't even mentioned in the 100 best car article in AUTOMOBILE magazine. That's just unforgivable hehe :)
BTW I now have more FDs than ever and am more addicted than ever. This car is phenomenal and will be LONG remembered.
THANKS! Jedon
|
