RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/)
-   -   ok can you SC(supercharge) a na rx-7 (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/ok-can-you-sc-supercharge-na-rx-7-a-454153/)

1990rx-7newb 08-16-05 07:53 PM

ok can you SC(supercharge) a na rx-7
 
i have been doing a lil reading and very curious can you SC a N/A rx-7 and what are the results and is it better than turborcharging?

MRX_Rotary 08-16-05 07:58 PM

You can supercharge anything, with money. Immediate boost is one benefit of being supercharged rather than turbo.

1990rx-7newb 08-16-05 08:03 PM

ok is it wasier...because i know to turbo a NA engine takes a LOT of fabrication....so with the high compression of a NA motor is it easier and better to do??

staticguitar313 08-16-05 08:04 PM

Search, its been done before.
Ups. No turbo lag, easier to pass emissions b/c there's nothing blocking the path between the engine and the catalytic converter(s). No need for BOV (in most situations)
Downs. More for the eccentric sharft to spin. Mostly mid-range power no high end. Placement can be difficult if you have all your AC, PS and emissions etc.

The rotary engine likes the turbo. :D

If you do any kind of forced induction wrong kiss your engine goodbye.

S/c and Turboing an NA take about the same amount of HARD WORK :rolleyes:

DemonicPupil 08-16-05 08:07 PM

Doing anything to an NA engine = fabrication.. turbo, SC.. dun really matter... even with the 3k+ Camden kit i think you still have to do some drillin and shit.. correct me if I'm wrong boys...

I want to finish my SC project, but just don't have cash atm.

1990rx-7newb 08-16-05 08:14 PM

ok so what kindaof performance can you coaxs out of a NA?

staticguitar313 08-16-05 08:17 PM

whatever your tuning abilities are

MRX_Rotary 08-16-05 08:20 PM

Yeah, it's all up to what you want. You can get a Peripheral Port N/A pushing out, what? 350HP IIRC? But that's strictly for racing applications, not street.

BTW, search is your friend... and spell check too.

1990rx-7newb 08-16-05 08:47 PM

ok can you suggest any good web sites to look at for tuning a NA

Rancid7 08-16-05 08:52 PM

IMHO your are already at the best website to find information JUST USE THE SEARCH FEATURE !!!

ramtookrazy 08-16-05 09:18 PM

rx7club knows about everything

adrock3217 08-16-05 09:26 PM

I don't think anyone has made the note yet. For the power:money ratio...turbo is all out better than supercharging for these cars. Most 3,000 dollar supercharger its, custom or not, will net something like..250 RWHP.

arghx 08-16-05 09:51 PM

^ which can be done for like a grand on a Turbo II if you get some good deals

RotaryEvolution 08-16-05 10:39 PM


Originally Posted by staticguitar313
Search, its been done before.
Ups. No turbo lag, easier to pass emissions b/c there's nothing blocking the path between the engine and the catalytic converter(s). No need for BOV (in most situations)
Downs. More for the eccentric sharft to spin. Mostly mid-range power no high end. Placement can be difficult if you have all your AC, PS and emissions etc.

The rotary engine likes the turbo. :D

If you do any kind of forced induction wrong kiss your engine goodbye.

S/c and Turboing an NA take about the same amount of HARD WORK :rolleyes:



may be ok to pass emissions in some states but in california and many other states it is an illegal mod and will fail the visual inspection.

Jager 08-16-05 11:08 PM


Originally Posted by staticguitar313
Search, its been done before.
Ups. No turbo lag, easier to pass emissions b/c there's nothing blocking the path between the engine and the catalytic converter(s). No need for BOV (in most situations)
Downs. More for the eccentric sharft to spin. Mostly mid-range power no high end. Placement can be difficult if you have all your AC, PS and emissions etc.

The rotary engine likes the turbo. :D

If you do any kind of forced induction wrong kiss your engine goodbye.

S/c and Turboing an NA take about the same amount of HARD WORK :rolleyes:


Turbo lag? A centrifical blower on an RX-7 (IE Paxton) doesn't start making good power until 4,000 RPM.

Placement is relatively simple, check out IntegraLS, just relocate the throttle body and place it where the AC and PS was. Since pussies use AC and PSing anyways :eek: .

And yes the Rotary engine does like the turbo made from all the fun exhaust gases we push out.

Also it has be PROVEN TIME AND TIME AGAIN that forced induction on an NA is just fine IF IT IS TUNED CORRECTLY. I hate when people tell others that. Sonik, Aaron Cake, Integra and ALL proving that wrong.

staticguitar313 08-16-05 11:33 PM


Originally Posted by Jager
Turbo lag? A centrifical blower on an RX-7 (IE Paxton) doesn't start making good power until 4,000 RPM.

Placement is relatively simple, check out IntegraLS, just relocate the throttle body and place it where the AC and PS was. Since pussies use AC and PSing anyways :eek: .

And yes the Rotary engine does like the turbo made from all the fun exhaust gases we push out.

Also it has be PROVEN TIME AND TIME AGAIN that forced induction on an NA is just fine IF IT IS TUNED CORRECTLY. I hate when people tell others that. Sonik, Aaron Cake, Integra and ALL proving that wrong.


Wasn't talking about centrifical, fuck those, i'm talking a big honking whipple blower!!!!! Yeah i know we can do forced induction on NA i have half the part to turbo mine,, I said if you do any kind of forced induction WRONG kiss your engine goodbye, read the whole sentence man. :rolleyes: :eek: :D :cool:

Jager 08-16-05 11:41 PM


Originally Posted by staticguitar313
Wasn't talking about centrifical, fuck those, i'm talking a big honking whipple blower!!!!! Yeah i know we can do forced induction on NA i have half the part to turbo mine,, I said if you do any kind of forced induction WRONG kiss your engine goodbye, read the whole sentence man. :rolleyes: :eek: :D :cool:

Sorry, if I could read minds, I'de be a millionaire ;).


Stating that doing anything wrong with your engine will blow it is just common sense. I thought you meant more in your statement instead of just stating a basic fact. Either way I don't care :jerkit: ,

88IntegraLS 08-17-05 01:02 AM


Originally Posted by 1990rx-7newb
ok is it wasier...because i know to turbo a NA engine takes a LOT of fabrication....so with the high compression of a NA motor is it easier and better to do??

Neither are easy. The most simple path to a fast RX7 is start with the right car: a TII.

Jager 08-17-05 06:24 PM


Originally Posted by 88IntegraLS
Neither are easy. The most simple path to a fast RX7 is start with the right car: a TII.

Ain't that the truth.

Madrx7racer 08-17-05 06:40 PM

first of all.....you can TUrbo an NA by doing an engine swap.......that's the EASIEST way to get more power.

a guy on here SC'ed his vert and only got 187rwhp (37 hp more than my fiancee's NA dynoed to the wheels) which seems like a waste of cash........you can turbo the NA motor but again you will need to fabricate a lot of crap for the FC......


the MOST you can push in an NA without porting the motor is anywhere between 150-160 rwhp......

Jager 08-17-05 06:45 PM

CodeBlue has thousands into her car for 209HP.

If can, find an old Paxton or go Whipple.

Madrx7racer 08-17-05 06:48 PM

those thousands would have yielded more HP if she had done a full TII swap and MODDED the car........wouldn't you agree?

88IntegraLS 08-17-05 11:28 PM


Originally Posted by Jager
CodeBlue has thousands into her car for 209HP.

If can, find an old Paxton or go Whipple.

Damn shame too, if only she knew in advance how much worse a straight two lobe rotor based roots blower is compared to the Eaton M90, which itself isn't spectacular.

The only way to compete with the power and efficiency of turbos is to pick a belt driven compressor with near the same efficiency (ie. how much more heat the charger puts into the compressed air than it would have had if based on the ideal gas law).

Oh well. At least she has 209 rwhp, which should be kind of fun.

Dltreezan 08-18-05 06:39 AM

88 how much do you expect to get out of your setup?

Mankdrake 2661 08-18-05 07:11 PM

Isn't boost, boost?
Whether it's from a turbo or an SC? The only major difference is what RPM it starts at. So wouldn't SCing an N/A or turboing an N/A other than fabing parts be equally hard on the motor?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands