dude is it just me or do you not have the dashpot for your secondary throttle plates hooked up.. maybe its just the pic

so what happened to this? can it be done for under $500?

was there ever a write-up on this?

That zbrown guy could probably have made some dough patenting the exact bracket shape or something along those lines...

has this been disproved yet? has it been shown worthwhile? Has it blwon up any engines, or anything along those lines?

anyone know what size pulley he was using and how much boost he was getting after it was all complete?

he was using a 3.5 inch pulley and pushing 6psi @ 1500 rpm

Please let this thread die? This setup was TERRIBLE and should NOT be duplicated.

I'd like to try it...................J/k

Die!

i've got this designned all up but alot better..... intercooler all the works, so we'll see how it goes

If you're using the same charger, it'll be a waste of time.

And, unless you relocate the throttle body to BEFORE the supercharger, and install a proper bypass, it'll be horribly inefficient. The cost of doing all of this makes supercharging pretty much worthless.

nah you're wrong. make sure you reocate your tb to before your turbo or it will be terribally in efficiant. LOL! :D This set up is fine if you only want about 200whp. Which can be done with a nice street port without the charger.

Don't make me stab you.

For the really retarded people who are going to believe the above:
A turbo isn't producing drag at idle, nor is it trying to compress everything it can get it's hand on. Thus, why a turbo doesn't require a bypass valve at idle/cruise.

Putting a supercharger (short of a centrifugal), BEFORE your TB is just retarded.

Could always put a vacuum activated valve in front of the charger instead of the throttle body. *grin*

har.. another bump

The charger will displace X ammount of air, that air would then leak out of your vacuum activated valve, and bleed back off infront of the charger itself since the engine can't use that much (neither will your throttle plates allow that much to flow through it), not exactly a good idea. There's no restriction in that setup, the charger is free to draw in as much air as it can, then compress/displace it. The only proper way to setup a positive displacement is AFTER the throttle body, so that it has a LIMITED supply of air under idle/cruise and not constantly trying to displace such a high volume when the engine doesn't need it.

I'm done trying to provide useful information in this thread, it's pointless. The retards will come in here, read all of the sarcastic rebuttles just to keep the thing alive, think it's true, and go attempt to do it in the most retarded way imaginable. Though, the least you people could do to bump this thread is come up with something that's not completely retarded and poorly thought out :(

Seriously are you people that ignorant(sp)? This is not a tough concept to grasp, it's simple logic, common sense .. I don't understand how some people can be so stupid.

Nawh diz $#!+ I$ off d4 h%k!! J[_]$+ aDD N4\/\/Z 4l\lD i+ \/\/0[_]LD 8E /\/\4D F4$+ YO!!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~mr_neil/r34d.jpg

She needs a tan.
Her skin is too pasty.


-Ted

That, and 5 more years.

Hah, what Ted meant to say was... 'she ain't asian!'

...or something like that. :)
But like scathcart said, she does look young.
I'd still hit it though! :D
I don't find girls that glow in the dark particularly arousing. :D


-Ted

Jailbait!

/\ /\ /\ Not in Alaska its 14 and up there Washington is 16 and up!

what does that say?


She is cute also!

And we're done here.