RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/)
-   -   How do you make your FC3S run cooler ? (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/how-do-you-make-your-fc3s-run-cooler-415026/)

wthdidusay82 04-14-05 06:53 AM

How do you make your FC3S run cooler ?
 
Ok im wondering how you make your FC's run cooler temps... I have an s4 n/a and i was planning to turbo, I know they have smaller coolant passages on the n/a housings and was wondering what I could do to compensate for this...

I bought some waterwetter but I dont really think that is going to do anything much...what else can I do that marginally cheap to make my car run cooler ?

Nick86 04-14-05 07:13 AM

First thing to do is make sure that all the stock plastic baffles and shields are in place. The undertray, the pieces under the hood in front of the rad - etc. Make sure your clutch fan works, and the water wetter will help.

But once you do those minor things - the next 'real' step is an upgraded rad. If you are going turbo, this might be something you'll want to include in your upgrade. If you are adding a FMIC to your newly turbo'd engined - then you will DEFINATELY want a bigger better rad.

wthdidusay82 04-14-05 07:22 AM


Originally Posted by Nick86
First thing to do is make sure that all the stock plastic baffles and shields are in place. The undertray, the pieces under the hood in front of the rad - etc. Make sure your clutch fan works, and the water wetter will help.

But once you do those minor things - the next 'real' step is an upgraded rad. If you are going turbo, this might be something you'll want to include in your upgrade. If you are adding a FMIC to your newly turbo'd engined - then you will DEFINATELY want a bigger better rad.


was prolly just gonna get a top mount tII intercooler and tII hood ... more cheaper this way i guess unless i just get the fmic (since the hood may have to be painted)

Roddimus Prime 04-14-05 08:39 AM

I had a spare FAL 12" slim-fan laying around so I removed the stock fan/clutch and fan shroud and mounted the slim fan directly to the radiator. These FAL 12" fans move a LOT of air around...I'm sure much more than any stock fan could. I'm also looking to upgrade my cooling system so I've bouht a new thermostat, several gallons of distilled water and a bottle of redline water wetter. This has been my combination of choice in all of my cars including my 300+hp Taurus SHO. The SHO's are HIGHLY dependent on cool running temps to make any power. The distilled water+water wetter always worked best for me.

good luck

ultradef 04-14-05 08:43 AM


Originally Posted by Roddimus Prime
I had a spare FAL 12" slim-fan laying around so I removed the stock fan/clutch and fan shroud and mounted the slim fan directly to the radiator. These FAL 12" fans move a LOT of air around...I'm sure much more than any stock fan could.

The stock fan & shroud is actually very good. Most people find that their temps are cooler with the stock fan & shroud than with an electric fan. Of course this all depends on how big the e-fan is, the size of the shroud used, etc. but as a general rule the stock fan & shroud is better at cooling.

kungfuroy 04-14-05 09:10 AM

A cheap thing you can do is adjust the antifreeze/water ratio of your radiator fluid. If you don't think it will be getting colder in RI anytime soon, do a flush and then pour in a mix with a higher amount of water. The only problem/hassle with this is making sure to change over to a winter ratio when the cold weather comes

DaKill3rInstinct 05-29-12 05:53 PM


Originally Posted by ultradef (Post 4249819)
The stock fan & shroud is actually very good. Most people find that their temps are cooler with the stock fan & shroud than with an electric fan. Of course this all depends on how big the e-fan is, the size of the shroud used, etc. but as a general rule the stock fan & shroud is better at cooling.

I was thinking of going electric....but I also heard roomers about the electric fans failing....?? So am I better off with my stock fan? Should I go electric? For better cooling with a bigger fan? What's you're out put?

barkz 05-29-12 05:59 PM

http://www.funnypictureblog.com/site.../face-palm.gif

tuscanidream 05-29-12 09:41 PM


Originally Posted by wthdidusay82 (Post 4249585)
Ok im wondering how you make your FC's run cooler temps... I have an s4 n/a and i was planning to turbo, I know they have smaller coolant passages on the n/a housings and was wondering what I could do to compensate for this...

I bought some waterwetter but I dont really think that is going to do anything much...what else can I do that marginally cheap to make my car run cooler ?

Are you doing a custom turbo setup, or swapping t2 components over? What turbo?

Stock fan are good as already stated. An electric fan is really only needed for when custom setups don't allow the conventional fan (like a vmount or cramming in a 20b). An upgraded radiator might be your best bet for a cooling upgrade, next an intercooler.

Budget, route and time constraints will determine your cooling needs. I went overboard on my setup, but wanted to take my time on the build and have a setup ready for anything.

GregW 05-30-12 01:28 AM

You dont want your car to "run cooler" you want it to take away enough heat to maintain operating temps while under load.

Since you say your running a top mount I assume an s4 or s5 turbo. The stock rad and oil cooler will work just fine e-fan or stock.

To some of us your question is like asking how to make your tires more round so they can be rounder betterer.

fc3sfreek 05-30-12 03:03 AM

Does nobody else (except barkz) realize that this thread was made 7 years ago? Lol i dont think he'll be responding

Digi7ech 05-30-12 10:46 AM

To the Zombie bumper,
Get a ford taurus E-fan

It is THE ONLY E-fan worth trusting to pull enough air.

clokker 05-30-12 10:59 AM


Originally Posted by Digi7ech (Post 11107417)
To the Zombie bumper,
Get a ford taurus E-fan

It is THE ONLY E-fan worth trusting to pull enough air.

I disagree.
Both Lincoln and Volvo have fans that I know from personal experience work just fine.

sharingan 19 05-30-12 12:21 PM

And the mercury villager, and pontiac fiero fan that Aaron cake uses...

Digi7ech 05-30-12 12:31 PM

Good examples as well.

The Lincoln fan is the same as tuarus I think. I've gone salvage yard searching and some of the lincolns share the same motor. Most are clutch fan though.

I was saying that more in the way of to discourage him from buying those stupid fans at pepboys that only pull 1000cfm

DaKill3rInstinct 05-31-12 03:08 PM


Originally Posted by fc3sfreek (Post 11107220)
Does nobody else (except barkz) realize that this thread was made 7 years ago? Lol i dont think he'll be responding

It is but I've been thinking about switching to an electric fan and my friend told me they fail in the second gen....so I needed some opinions so im glad they're talking lol

clokker 05-31-12 03:46 PM


Originally Posted by Digi7ech (Post 11107536)
Good examples as well.

The Lincoln fan is the same as tuarus I think.

No, it's larger.


Originally Posted by DaKill3rInstinct (Post 11108649)
It is but I've been thinking about switching to an electric fan and my friend told me they fail in the second gen....

Balderdash.

fc3sfreek 05-31-12 05:33 PM


Originally Posted by DaKill3rInstinct (Post 11108649)
It is but I've been thinking about switching to an electric fan and my friend told me they fail in the second gen....so I needed some opinions so im glad they're talking lol

Yea they only fail if u use some 10" pepboys fan that can barely blow a leaf away

sharingan 19 05-31-12 05:43 PM

Or.....you wire it up like a jackass.
Or......you wire it to a toggle switch and forget to turn it on.

Dak 05-31-12 08:51 PM

I've been running this fan for probably ten years with no problem. Of course I am n/a but I think it would be fine on a turbo car as well.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/PRM-19115/?rtype=10

https://static.summitracing.com/glob...rm-19115_w.jpg

It sure was cheaper ten years ago.

tuscanidream 06-01-12 05:42 AM

I choose to go with spal. Yet to test it, but I'm not worried. 2024cfm. It's sealed and slim, perfect for being low to the ground with my vmount. http://www.spalusa.com/store/main.as...&item=30102049

Ps make a shroud and it will perform much better.

clokker 06-01-12 07:48 AM


Originally Posted by tuscanidream (Post 11109351)
I choose to go with spal. Yet to test it, but I'm not worried. 2024cfm. It's sealed and slim, perfect for being low to the ground with my vmount. http://www.spalusa.com/store/main.as...&item=30102049

Ps make a shroud and it will perform much better.

Yes, by all means shroud your fan(s).
The further you can space the fan from the rad core, the better.

As for CFM...it's a nonsense statistic without more info about the test conditions, specifically was the test performed in "free" air (no restriction) or not.
Usually you'll be seeing CFM based on no restriction because it looks better (higher number) but mount it on a radiator and things change quickly.

How the rad is mounted also makes a big difference.
If the core is perpendicular to airflow, the fan doesn't work as hard because the air wants to flow through.
The more acute the mounting angle (say, tuscan's v-mount), the harder the fan works to pull air.
Ductwork in front of the rad can mitigate less than optimal rad placement, the design being more critical in a multi-matrix setup (again, the v-mount).
Air, like water, much prefers the path of least resistance and it would be easy to end up with one core (say, the intercooler) flowing much better than the other (the radiator) due to extraction conditions post-cooler.

Like any system, the cooling loop will have an operational sweet spot- the combination of factors (vehicle speed, RPM, ambient temp, etc.) that produce optimal performance. On either side of this "spot", performance degrades.

Depending on your creativity, ability and dedication you can engineer this sweet spot to coincide with the normal operating conditions of your particular car (and remember, you, the driver, are one of those "operating conditions").

DaKill3rInstinct 06-01-12 11:36 AM


Originally Posted by tuscanidream (Post 11109351)
I choose to go with spal. Yet to test it, but I'm not worried. 2024cfm. It's sealed and slim, perfect for being low to the ground with my vmount. http://www.spalusa.com/store/main.as...&item=30102049

Ps make a shroud and it will perform much better.

Is ur car turbo? And how did u make ur shroud btw?

DaKill3rInstinct 06-01-12 11:44 AM


Originally Posted by clokker (Post 11109415)
Yes, by all means shroud your fan(s).
The further you can space the fan from the rad core, the better.

As for CFM...it's a nonsense statistic without more info about the test conditions, specifically was the test performed in "free" air (no restriction) or not.
Usually you'll be seeing CFM based on no restriction because it looks better (higher number) but mount it on a radiator and things change quickly.

How the rad is mounted also makes a big difference.
If the core is perpendicular to airflow, the fan doesn't work as hard because the air wants to flow through.
The more acute the mounting angle (say, tuscan's v-mount), the harder the fan works to pull air.
Ductwork in front of the rad can mitigate less than optimal rad placement, the design being more critical in a multi-matrix setup (again, the v-mount).
Air, like water, much prefers the path of least resistance and it would be easy to end up with one core (say, the intercooler) flowing much better than the other (the radiator) due to extraction conditions post-cooler.


Like any system, the cooling loop will have an operational sweet spot- the combination of factors (vehicle speed, RPM, ambient temp, etc.) that produce optimal performance. On either side of this "spot", performance degrades.

Depending on your creativity, ability and dedication you can engineer this sweet spot to coincide with the normal operating conditions of your particular car (and remember, you, the driver, are one of those "operating conditions").

Wow that really cleared up a lot....

sharingan 19 06-01-12 11:49 AM


Originally Posted by clokker (Post 11109415)
Yes, by all means shroud your fan(s).
The further you can space the fan from the rad core, the better.

As for CFM...it's a nonsense statistic without more info about the test conditions, specifically was the test performed in "free" air (no restriction) or not.
Usually you'll be seeing CFM based on no restriction because it looks better (higher number) but mount it on a radiator and things change quickly.

How the rad is mounted also makes a big difference.
If the core is perpendicular to airflow, the fan doesn't work as hard because the air wants to flow through.
The more acute the mounting angle (say, tuscan's v-mount), the harder the fan works to pull air.
Ductwork in front of the rad can mitigate less than optimal rad placement, the design being more critical in a multi-matrix setup (again, the v-mount).
Air, like water, much prefers the path of least resistance and it would be easy to end up with one core (say, the intercooler) flowing much better than the other (the radiator) due to extraction conditions post-cooler.

Like any system, the cooling loop will have an operational sweet spot- the combination of factors (vehicle speed, RPM, ambient temp, etc.) that produce optimal performance. On either side of this "spot", performance degrades.

Depending on your creativity, ability and dedication you can engineer this sweet spot to coincide with the normal operating conditions of your particular car (and remember, you, the driver, are one of those "operating conditions").

+1 birlliant.

I've been running a v-mount with no ducting whatsoever for roughly 2 years. It did great in cool weather (<70) but it struggled above 85*. Cruising at 70mph temps stayed around 200* ironically they stayed around 190* around town cruising at lower speeds. The problem was sitting still , temps would climb up to 217* before I shut it down and let it cool down. To combat this I added an oil cooler fan, which bought be about another 5 min of run time, but certainly didn't cure the problem.

Recently I broke down and actually made some ducting for the sides and plugged the gap between the two cores (Rad and IC). WOW! in 90*+ ambient temps it will not go higher than 180*. Around town it stays around 180-185* depending on speed and idling has only gotten up to 198*.

tuscanidream 06-01-12 01:18 PM


Originally Posted by DaKill3rInstinct (Post 11109600)
Is ur car turbo? And how did u make ur shroud btw?

Of course its turbo! :big thumb: I didn't make a shroud yet. Engine should be back from rebuild tomorrow. Still a work in progress. It shouldn't be hard for some one to make for me, or I might even be able to make it myself.

Here is my radiator, pre modifications. Water outlet is now on the side. There is 4 vertical mounts, so I basically need a large square piece of sheet aluminum and to fold over the edges. Tape on the corners. Large hole in the center for the fan. 4 holes to mount shroud to radiator. 4 holes and rivets to mount fan to shroud.

http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/a...C/ed0dc53c.jpg

Duct work on the front to feed radiator. If you look closely, you can see that its divided. Each unit gets its own share of air.

http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/a...C/2112c42b.jpg

Girlfriends t2 is keeping the oem fan ftw. Obviously, I could not keep the oem fan with the type of config I went with.

tuscanidream 06-01-12 01:23 PM


Originally Posted by sharingan 19 (Post 11109612)
+1 birlliant.

I've been running a v-mount with no ducting whatsoever for roughly 2 years. It did great in cool weather (<70) but it struggled above 85*. Cruising at 70mph temps stayed around 200* ironically they stayed around 190* around town cruising at lower speeds. The problem was sitting still , temps would climb up to 217* before I shut it down and let it cool down. To combat this I added an oil cooler fan, which bought be about another 5 min of run time, but certainly didn't cure the problem.

Recently I broke down and actually made some ducting for the sides and plugged the gap between the two cores (Rad and IC). WOW! in 90*+ ambient temps it will not go higher than 180*. Around town it stays around 180-185* depending on speed and idling has only gotten up to 198*.

Pics of oil cooler fan? Curious. :icon_tup:

sharingan 19 06-02-12 02:03 PM

2 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by tuscanidream (Post 11109709)
Pics of oil cooler fan? Curious. :icon_tup:

Sorry, these are the best pics I have atm.

Its a 120mm PC fan. Teflon coated bearings, waterproof (like runs under water--waterproof) around 200 cfm. I just have one for now, but I will add another when I get the a/c working. I spaced it so there is room for 3 but you could fit 4 edge to edge if you really wanted to.

clokker 06-02-12 03:21 PM

I have never seen- nor heard of- a computer fan that is waterproof and pulls 200cfm.
Adda's own spec sheet claims 175cfm in free air and makes no mention of being waterproof.
I'd give it less than a month in that environment.

SpikeDerailed 06-02-12 11:49 PM


Originally Posted by sharingan 19 (Post 11110759)
Sorry, these are the best pics I have atm.

Its a 120mm PC fan. Teflon coated bearings, waterproof (like runs under water--waterproof) around 200 cfm. I just have one for now, but I will add another when I get the a/c working. I spaced it so there is room for 3 but you could fit 4 edge to edge if you really wanted to.

You must let me know how this works. my coolant temps are always fine, but the oil temps skyrocket when drifting.

Aaron Cake 06-03-12 10:22 AM

The fan from the Harley Davidson V-rod fits the FC oil cooler almost perfectly.

Of course being a Harley part you have to deal with the fan dripping oil, but it still works...

clokker 06-03-12 10:46 AM


Originally Posted by Aaron Cake (Post 11111592)
The fan from the Harley Davidson V-rod fits the FC oil cooler almost perfectly.

Of course being a Harley part you have to deal with the fan dripping oil, but it still works...

That seems like a much better alternative than a PC fan.
I think you're required to be tattooed to purchase one though.

sharingan 19 06-03-12 02:17 PM


Originally Posted by clokker (Post 11110809)
I have never seen- nor heard of- a computer fan that is waterproof and pulls 200cfm.
Adda's own spec sheet claims 175cfm in free air and makes no mention of being waterproof.
I'd give it less than a month in that environment.

Only I didn't get the fan from ADDA, I got it from a company that modifies the fans (I'm assuming lower friction increases cfm?....175 is "around" 200 anyway). I respect your skepticism, but in this instance it is misplaced.


Open mouth.....insert foot....:wink:


marshall13B 06-03-12 02:39 PM


Originally Posted by Aaron Cake (Post 11111592)
The fan from the Harley Davidson V-rod fits the FC oil cooler almost perfectly.

Of course being a Harley part you have to deal with the fan dripping oil, but it still works...

Do you currently happen to know where one of interest may be able to obtain one?

sharingan 19 06-03-12 02:57 PM

These PC fans fit perfectly (not almost) the question is how much air does the harley fan pull? If its under 200cfm, or it costs more than $25 shipped brand new, it is likely a less desirable solution. Also interested in how many amps it pulls?

When I'm done w/engine break in I can do some more rigorous testing, but so far its been great. Keep in mind that my oil cooler is in the stock location, way behind and underneath the rad, so this fan PC is the only source of airflow while not moving at a moderate speed. (I was running this fan for 3 months before my engine rebuild and its been 1 month since...)

marshall13B 06-03-12 03:11 PM


Originally Posted by sharingan 19 (Post 11111817)
These PC fans fit perfectly (not almost) the question is how much air does the harley fan pull? If its under 200cfm, or it costs more than $25 shipped brand new, it is likely a less desirable solution. Also interested in how many amps it pulls?

When I'm done w/engine break in I can do some more rigorous testing, but so far its been great. Keep in mind that my oil cooler is in the stock location, way behind and underneath the rad, so this fan PC is the only source of airflow while not moving at a moderate speed. (I was running this fan for 3 months before my engine rebuild and its been 1 month since...)

Are they available online? I'm interested in more info (price/availability).

sharingan 19 06-03-12 03:23 PM


Originally Posted by marshall13B (Post 11111834)
Are they available online? I'm interested in more info (price/availability).

EVERYTHING is available online. Search the name in the youtube vid as a seller on ebay, thats where I got mine. They may have an actual website, I dunno, I'm not a sales rep.

I got bored, so I did a little research. The harley fans go for $60-70 new (plus shipping) and pull a little over 300cfm in free air @ 3.6A.

For $50 I could run 2 waterproof fans with better fitment, pulling 350 cfm (2x175) or 400cfm (2x200) @ 2.84 amps and 3.9 amps respectively. And no oil leaks :lol:

"The choice is yours!" - Cpt. Planet

clokker 06-03-12 03:45 PM

Sorry I questioned you sharingan, I was wrong, you were right.
I do wonder why a PC fan would need to be waterproof though.

sharingan 19 06-03-12 04:14 PM


Originally Posted by clokker (Post 11111881)
Sorry I questioned you sharingan, I was wrong, you were right.
I do wonder why a PC fan would need to be waterproof though.

A valid question indeed. I believe the impetus lies with these high end computing systems that actually utilize liquid cooling systems inside the pc case. Although, in the event such a system were to spring a leak, the resilience of my fans would be the least of my worries....guess thats just me :dunno:

clokker 06-03-12 04:27 PM

For the past 10 years all of my PCs have been watercooled and it never even occurred to me to seek out a waterproof fan.
Never had a leak or destroyed a part either.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/clocker/TJ2.jpg

sharingan 19 06-03-12 04:39 PM

Well damn!
If thats the case then they must be making these fans for FC3S oil coolers then, lucky us!

(now I feel worse about making 80% of my posts from my phone, lol).


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands