You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access
to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to start new topics, reply to conversations, privately message other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join RX7Club.com today!
Wondering how they stack up against Stand alones for adjustablity.
"version 2.0 will not only include a 100 point fuel correction map but will also include two 361 point timing maps, one for leading and one for trailing" ~ Taken off of Pocketlogger.com
How do the adjustment maps stack up to most stand alones?
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members. Register your free account today and become a member on RX7Club.com!
First thank you for the Uber obvious answer of "search" As though i probably didnt do that already because my post count is 1.
And secondly the plug and play is what apeals to me so much about the Rtek. Just wondering how close the Fuel/Timing correction maps come to the correction points on a common stand alone.
The only problem with that, is it's still using the stock crusty harness, that was one of the best parts about a standalone, getting rid of that busted old peice of crap!
The more common stand alones used for an RX7... IE Haltech, Wolf 3D, Microtech...
And i really dont mind using the "crusty old harness" As long as you take car of it itll take care of you. Mind you that most vehicles i work on are around the same age as my FC so im used to working around it.
Actually, y'know... I don't see an active thread for the Rtek 2.0. Hell, I didn't even know it had been released until this thread reminded me to check.
Impressions? Is everyone freaked out by the cost? How do the specs stack up to expectations?
Actually, y'know... I don't see an active thread for the Rtek 2.0. Hell, I didn't even know it had been released until this thread reminded me to check.
Impressions? Is everyone freaked out by the cost? How do the specs stack up to expectations?
It hasnt been released yet and if the price of $400 that they have on thier site is going to be the final price then i think that is damn good
The only problem with that, is it's still using the stock crusty harness, that was one of the best parts about a standalone, getting rid of that busted old peice of crap!
And i really dont mind using the "crusty old harness" As long as you take car of it itll take care of you. Mind you that most vehicles i work on are around the same age as my FC so im used to working around it.
Sorry to say but it was crap from the minute it left the factory.....
The heat of 15+ years has made it even worse.
I would love a totally gone through harness, but I don't have the patience for that, and would rather get a E8 or E6X.
I was once all for the rtek 2.0, but I think I'll stop at the 1.7 and go with a real standalone.
The only problem with that, is it's still using the stock crusty harness, that was one of the best parts about a standalone, getting rid of that busted old peice of crap!
I have a standalone with my stock harness and I love it
cymfc3s runs a e6k w/ his stock s5 harness, but s5 is better than s4
call me a hypocrite (sp?), but i just saw that rtek 2.0 is out......consider it bought!
i was planning to run an rtek 1.7 w/ my HKS f-con for the adjustability, but I'm going to sell my F-con and just by the 2.0
This way I don't have to immediately upgrade to 720cc injectors and that and selling my fcon makes up for the price
But I'm still gonna go standalone when i go bigger than hybrid turbo, and the stock harness still sucks!!!!
What makes the s5 harness better than the s4 other than it being a couple years newer?
And, if you hate the old harness, how hard is it to make a NEW one? Just measure the old lengths.
Linear Mode
