Other Engine Conversions - non V-8 Discussion of non-rotary engines, exc V-8's, in a car originally powered by a Rotary Engine.

vq35 fd swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-09, 09:52 AM
  #1  
Lives on the Forum

Thread Starter
iTrader: (83)
 
Supernaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
vq35 fd swap

Sorry if this is a repost but I thought it was interesting...

http://www.superstreetonline.com/eve.../photo_07.html

I've never heard of a vq35 swap before. I would rather have an LS1 in their if I had to go pistons but still cool!
Old 08-04-09, 10:12 AM
  #2  
Wangan Nasty

 
Miata_mx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Irvine, Southern California
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The VQ is an overall better engine than an LS1.
Old 08-05-09, 06:46 PM
  #3  
is that rice i smell?

iTrader: (1)
 
bosscobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
didnt see any engine pics
Old 08-05-09, 10:15 PM
  #4  
Full Member

 
SKarpenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cecil, GA
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Miata_mx5
The VQ is an overall better engine than an LS1.
In what regard?
Old 08-06-09, 04:58 PM
  #5  
Talk to me....

iTrader: (2)
 
Uncle Hungry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: 600' up
Posts: 1,057
Received 50 Likes on 35 Posts
That is one ugly fd.
Old 08-06-09, 07:33 PM
  #6  
Pretty as a $20 whore

iTrader: (1)
 
Eat-Pez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SKarpenz
In what regard?
Room left over in the engine bay?

I believe GM showed the world what motor was better with the ZR1 vs GTR.
Old 08-06-09, 10:15 PM
  #7  
Full Member

 
SKarpenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cecil, GA
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Eat-Pez
Room left over in the engine bay?

I believe GM showed the world what motor was better with the ZR1 vs GTR.
Amen. The LS motors are superior in every aspect to the VQ.
Old 08-16-09, 11:41 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
1fastlatino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto ontario
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
agree'd the ls1 is tried tested and true theres almost nothing as far as performance that cannot be attained with an LS1
Old 08-16-09, 12:28 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

 
Sketch_hs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: sac
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
vq35 is junk!

ls1 is far superior at making power, despite how low tech it might be.
Old 09-07-09, 10:47 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
BonesZ33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it would probably a lot cheaper to swap.. and the vq35 is extremly reliable.. those can be some pros to it for those considering it.. i would just prefer it for the sound :P i hate borring v8 engines they sound like crap... personal preference
Old 09-12-09, 02:09 PM
  #11  
Project P --- Pedospeed

iTrader: (29)
 
*TOUCH*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Miata_mx5
The VQ is an overall better engine than an LS1.
haha...good one pal!
Old 09-15-09, 01:35 PM
  #12  
The Big Ugly!

 
rotordad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hate to say this but the ZR1 doesn't have a LS1 it has a LS9 6.2liter supercharged V8, the older ZO6 had LS7's. In the debate of GTR vs. ZR1 I have seen test going both ways & besides you are comparing a boosted V8 the LS9 against the VQ35DE V6. the comparison should be either the LS9 swap against the VQ38DETT swap or the basic LS1 against the basic VQ35DE. Both are amazing motors one a V6 & one a V8 which resond to mods very well. It comes down to where do you want your power & what do you want out of the car?

Last edited by rotordad; 09-15-09 at 01:42 PM.
Old 09-15-09, 10:28 PM
  #13  
Junior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
strmshdow84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotordad
I hate to say this but the ZR1 doesn't have a LS1 it has a LS9 6.2liter supercharged V8. Both are amazing motors one a V6 & one a V8 which resond to mods very well. It comes down to where do you want your power & what do you want out of the car?
the ls1-ls9 are all very similar, the ls9 is just basically a supercharged ls3. Yes both are amazing motors but the vq35de does not respond well to mods as i remember, just about the only thing you can do to them is turbo/supercharge without going into the engine since they are so maxed out from the factory(basically not much potential without a huge amount of money).
Old 09-16-09, 01:36 PM
  #14  
The Big Ugly!

 
rotordad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course the LS1 & LS9 are similar & with any motor when achieving high numbers you have to go into it. On one hand you have a V8 & the other a V6, I have a few friends with 350Z's & they are doing fine around 500 hp without spending a fortune. The LS1 would be the the best bang for the buck but if you are talking LS9 ha ha ha might as well get a Built Cosworth VQ shortblock or do the 4.2 stroker with boost & blow away that LS9. LS9 around 20k with 630hp. A LS1 with a 150 shot would be a very nice combo in a FC & cost shouldn't be all that bad.
Old 09-16-09, 01:42 PM
  #15  
Junior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
strmshdow84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotordad
Of course the LS1 & LS9 are similar & with any motor when achieving high numbers you have to go into it. On one hand you have a V8 & the other a V6, I have a few friends with 350Z's & they are doing fine around 500 hp without spending a fortune. The LS1 would be the the best bang for the buck but if you are talking LS9 ha ha ha might as well get a Built Cosworth VQ shortblock or do the 4.2 stroker with boost & blow away that LS9. LS9 around 20k with 630hp. A LS1 with a 150 shot would be a very nice combo in a FC & cost shouldn't be all that bad.
yea thats usually what the v8 guys do, just spray the hell out of it. for the vq guys wat all did they have to do to get to 500? I know all the basic bolt-ons dont do anything for them (full exhaust, cai)
Old 09-16-09, 05:14 PM
  #16  
The Big Ugly!

 
rotordad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ LOL they wish just some bolt ons got them there. Each one is running a different turbo set up, but all of them have custom intake mani's or running the plenum spacer, all of them except one is running the new plug & play Haltech, exhaust & cams ect.
Old 06-30-11, 02:52 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
BASEDLS7RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
would an ls9 even fit an fd, didn't Chevrolet have to raise the hood on the zr1
Old 07-20-11, 10:11 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
fccruizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the VQ engines are good at making power with simple boltons... they got vq35de engines making 400whp in japan.. and these arent full blown race cars either, they are customer cars that Z enthusiasts take to tuning shops to get 400whp naturally aspirated too btw.

but im not trying to be biased or anything... cause i honestly would rather have an ls1 over a vq35 too because its a v8.

but the vq engines still have my respect for their power potential..
Old 07-20-11, 10:37 PM
  #19  
Dub'N

iTrader: (5)
 
nitroracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: san diego
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Stock rods can only handle 400tq. waste of time with the vq35, unless you start upgrading internals.
Old 07-20-11, 10:55 PM
  #20  
Built Not Bought

iTrader: (14)
 
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 4,228
Likes: 0
Received 840 Likes on 529 Posts
My stock block VQ made 430whp for years at 9lbs of boost (single turbo). Thats as far as I was willing to push it, as the rods are the weak piece of the puzzle around that hp level.

I put new pistons, rods, and ARP bolts in, went with a twin turbo kit, and on pump gas made 650whp. Race gas was able to increase to high 700's with relatively small twin turbos (greddy 18g).

To me, thats a pretty nice engine. The LS1 would need to be built to make the same amount of power (reliably for extended use). They are both great engines. The LS1 is higher displacement, and therefore is at an advantage, there is no replacement for displacement. haha. But the VQ is a very efficient and reliable powerplant.
Old 09-20-11, 01:08 AM
  #21  
NiSmO FrE@k

 
supergoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: mohegan lake, NY
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nitroracer
Stock rods can only handle 400tq. waste of time with the vq35, unless you start upgrading internals.
if you are talking about the DE and rev-up motor's. the HR is an entirely different story, much more power no problem.

and 316hp Naturally aspirated stock.

not to mention it loves boost and it's head flow rate is great and on the HR motors the heads get cooled first which is a bonus.

the VQ35HR and VQ37VHR guys are making anywheres from 400-500whp on pump and 600whp on race on the stock engines reliably. some people have blown their motors but there will always be a few.
Old 09-20-11, 01:19 AM
  #22  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (9)
 
turboIIrotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: dayton,ohio
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
VQ sounds like a race car ls1 sounds like someone's exhaust fell off lol.
Old 04-30-12, 08:46 AM
  #23  
Full Member
 
TheGloriousTachikoma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's another consideration in the VQ's favor that no-one has listed, Weight. I thought the point of these cars was the great balance and handling, and especially on a NA rotary, the extra weight of the V8, even if it's aluminum, upsets that balance. I imagine the VQ would be around...20% lighter than a LSX, no? And shorter too, which would further work to keep weight towards the rear.
Old 04-30-12, 09:45 AM
  #24  
死*神*

iTrader: (4)
 
dream36realms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delaware
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no the VQ isn't much li9ghter than the LS. I havent weighed my VQ but I know my LS1/t56 pullout with fluids is barely 800lbs. The Vq is a good motor and I daily mine but the saying is very true, best bang for $ is the LS fabily of motors. If you have a nissan motor sitting around go for it, if not dont waste your money./

oh, and this is a really old thread.
Old 04-30-12, 10:42 PM
  #25  
Don't worry, Be happy
 
ssonsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: where the fish fly and the birds swim, (Ga)
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol^^
vq sound so awesome, and they're suppper cheap now. I'd rather do a VQ swap over a Ls1 if VQ swaps were cheap to do like Ls1 :L


Quick Reply: vq35 fd swap



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 PM.