Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

Bridge port EFI and mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-14, 06:28 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
costas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: amherst MA
Posts: 112
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Bridge port EFI and mpg

What kind of mpg can a 13b bridge port get with ITB and fuel injection ? I know that I shouldn't think of fuel consumption with a Bridge port but we are considering fuel injection over a weber carb for a friends rx7 1st gen as he drives it more than once a week.
Thanks
Old 04-12-14, 08:28 PM
  #2  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
it really depends on the ECU and how well you can refine the tune, i've seen some claim over 20mpg still with a bridge but most usually get in the 16-18mpg range on the highway, in town forget about it.

the issue is mainly with the MAP sensor signals being extremely spikey and AFRs all over the place. a carb can do the just as well if you can tune it, i've thrown together a few n/a bridges with holley carbs that ran further on the highway than some of the turbo FI cars.

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; 04-12-14 at 08:32 PM.
Old 04-13-14, 01:52 PM
  #3  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,503
Received 411 Likes on 294 Posts
Depending on the weather, 18-29mpg highway. Weather is a very large factor, the hotter it is the better the fuel economy is. I can generally expect 25mpg under normal conditions.

That is highway driving. In city driving, I get maybe 2-5mpg. I do very little city driving so this does not concern me. Cold start and idle are economy killers.

I drive the car maybe 600 miles per week plus regular 500-700 mile weekends, averaging about 20k per year. Fuel economy IS a major concern for me, since the less fuel it uses, the more I get to enjoy the car.

I have a slightly larger than "homologation" bridge port on the secondaries (appears to be the same port window as Racing Beat sells... heck they probably developed it for Mazda ) and due to the tiny primary ports I have to run, the primaries are slightly smaller but the eyebrows are still the full height of the port runner.

My throttle body is an old Holley 750cfm vac-sec carb (the ubiquitous 3310) that I milled the choke horn off of and modified for 1:1 mechanical secondaries. Bodged a TPS from a 2-valve Ford 4.6 on the side where the choke linkage would go. Vacuum signal for the EFI (I run speed-density, not alpha-N) comes from the port under the primary fuel bowl, and the signal is cleaned up with a restrictor orifice I made by gluing a piece of carb cleaner straw into a vacuum connector. It's still a little bouncy but nothing severe. The engine's bouncy anyway
Old 04-14-14, 04:29 AM
  #4  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Pettersen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 604
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryEvolution

the issue is mainly with the MAP sensor signals being extremely spikey and AFRs all over the place.

A guy on the dodge neon forum had great success using this to get a good vac signal.

Name:  tree3.jpg
Views: 302
Size:  42.6 KB

Full thread:
www.neons.org • View topic - ITB's rule the world
Old 08-06-14, 09:01 PM
  #5  
Junior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
thatkid2007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tigard, oregon
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bridge port owns!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
danielbradley2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
09-28-15 10:44 PM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
09-17-15 09:22 PM
scissorhands
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
09-16-15 01:25 PM



Quick Reply: Bridge port EFI and mpg



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 PM.