Build Threads
Sponsored by:

4 rotor build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-17, 01:14 AM
  #26  
Full Member

 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 233
Received 36 Likes on 21 Posts
You won't have the benefit of the APV valves which basically means it's a 4 port with 6 port irons . The port timing on 6 port irons is inferior to the 4 port if you aren't using the apv. Ad to this that the two middle rotors have inferior intake runners as well as inferior exhaust ports and you have an engine that will offer less power than 2x 4 port engines. I think you will struggle to break 300whp.
I think your best bet to do better is to port the exhaust ports as much as possible and bridgeport it .
Old 01-10-17, 12:06 PM
  #27  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
dangamble2016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: J hi d in dndkd
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
You won't have the benefit of the APV valves which basically means it's a 4 port with 6 port irons . The port timing on 6 port irons is inferior to the 4 port if you aren't using the apv. Ad to this that the two middle rotors have inferior intake runners as well as inferior exhaust ports and you have an engine that will offer less power than 2x 4 port engines. I think you will struggle to break 300whp.
I think your best bet to do better is to port the exhaust ports as much as possible and bridgeport it .
The plan was to port the irons as much as I could to over come this but this would always have been a proble as i wasnt going PP. I know that the apv won't be used as I'll probably be doing something along the lines of independent throttle bodies.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.