3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

No fuel or spark. Bad ECU?

Old 04-01-07, 11:21 PM
  #1  
The end of an era

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Andrew.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 4,717
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Angry No fuel or spark. Bad ECU?

A bit of background information: I got an fd with an engine fire, so I took the whole engine bay apart, bought a good used front main harness + battery harness, and replaced them. I then took apart my toasted engine, and had it rebuilt. I bought another complete longblock with blown coolant seals and transfered all of the external parts to the rebuilt shortblock, and put it all back together.

So I try to fire it up and the car gets no fuel. At first I thought it was a bad relay, so i got some other ones and tried testing them, and it still didn't work. So we tried to "jumper" (I believe that is the correct term) the relay connection and it did send fuel through. Odd. So after that, we thought we could at least fire up the car and see how it runs, but it didn't, because we had no spark. My buddy tested the voltage, and to actually see if any spark jumped, but we didn't get anything. The only electrical component I didn't replace was the ecu. Could that be it? The entire engine harness after the pd fire was completely toast, so I think that it might have just shorted out the ecu. Would a bad ecu cause no fuel or spark? If anyone has any ideas, feel free to throw them out.

Oh, and if that does end up being the case, could I get a 94 ecu off of any FD (Ca or non-Ca)? I was reading and I saw that the difference in Ca vs. non-Ca ecu's was on the 93's, and it was something about the electronic egr, but all 94's had that standard, so I could just get a 94 ecu and I should still be able to pass smog, right?

Thanks

-Andrew
Old 04-02-07, 12:18 AM
  #2  
apeiron

iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Double check all your grounds, and yea --- you will be fine with the ECU swap.
Old 04-02-07, 01:32 PM
  #3  
The end of an era

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Andrew.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 4,717
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by spoolage
Double check all your grounds, and yea --- you will be fine with the ECU swap.
Grounds are all good. Oh, and I need to check the ignitor the next time i'm up there as well.
Old 04-03-07, 01:50 PM
  #4  
The end of an era

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Andrew.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 4,717
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Nobody?
Old 04-03-07, 02:02 PM
  #5  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by andrewdruiz
The only electrical component I didn't replace was the ecu. Could that be it? The entire engine harness after the pd fire was completely toast, so I think that it might have just shorted out the ecu. Would a bad ecu cause no fuel or spark? If anyone has any ideas, feel free to throw them out.
A bad ECU could cause all kinds of problems. You should be able to have someone local (and in Cali I'm sure you can find someone) drop by to plug in their ECU to test that theory out. I wouldn't just run out and buy a new ECU.

I would also check the ground wires as previously mentioned. There is one that goes to the drivers side of the engine near the bottom. If that's not grounded, the car will not fire.

Also, make sure your CAS connectors are on properly. While that shouldn't keep the car from starting (just running well), just something else to check.

Originally Posted by andrewdruiz
Oh, and if that does end up being the case, could I get a 94 ecu off of any FD (Ca or non-Ca)? I was reading and I saw that the difference in Ca vs. non-Ca ecu's was on the 93's, and it was something about the electronic egr, but all 94's had that standard, so I could just get a 94 ecu and I should still be able to pass smog, right?
Have you verified that you actually have a Cali FD (i.e. you have the electric EGR switch)? If you indeed do have a '93 Cali FD, then a '94 ECU will be fine.
Old 04-03-07, 02:11 PM
  #6  
The end of an era

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Andrew.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 4,717
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
A bad ECU could cause all kinds of problems. You should be able to have someone local (and in Cali I'm sure you can find someone) drop by to plug in their ECU to test that theory out. I wouldn't just run out and buy a new ECU.

I would also check the ground wires as previously mentioned. There is one that goes to the drivers side of the engine near the bottom. If that's not grounded, the car will not fire.

Also, make sure your CAS connectors are on properly. While that shouldn't keep the car from starting (just running well), just something else to check.
I actually have a friend coming over on Saturday with his '94 to swap ecu's and test out my theory.

I'll triple check all of the grounds the next time I am up there (Friday) and the CAS connectors.


Originally Posted by Mahjik
Have you verified that you actually have a Cali FD (i.e. you have the electric EGR switch)? If you indeed do have a '93 Cali FD, then a '94 ECU will be fine.
The car is definitely a Cali FD. I bought the car from the original owner's son and he told me what dealership he bought it from, and he even included the transaction paper. BUT (thanks for reminding me) the extra long block I bought was a '94. And I basically rebuilt the short block and swapped all of the external parts from the '94 over. But that shouldn't make a difference since the electronic egr switch is standard on all of them, right?

I really hope it's something simple like the ECU
Old 04-03-07, 02:28 PM
  #7  
What's your point ?

 
CantGoStraight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Gainesville, Fla.
Posts: 3,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let me know if you need the 94 ECU. I pulled mine out when I put in the PEttit remapped one. Car was running fine on the original ECU.
Old 04-07-07, 12:46 AM
  #8  
The end of an era

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Andrew.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 4,717
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
So it was the ECU... An FD came by today and I asked him if I could use his ecu for a few minutes, so I took it off his car and put it in mine, and sure enough, the car fired up.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
09-02-18 09:53 AM
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
03-28-17 03:30 PM
befarrer
Microtech
3
08-22-15 05:52 PM
armans
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
5
08-15-15 09:08 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: No fuel or spark. Bad ECU?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 PM.