R1 vs. R2 - what are the differences

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-01, 11:41 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
86rx-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: no where
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question r1 vs r2

Which one is faster, if there is a faster.

Do they have a lots of difference except for the suspension.

thanks
86rx-7 is offline  
Old 10-25-01, 12:32 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
BrianK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
same speed... the only differences (other than suspension) will jive with the other trim levels. From another post:

Just to pass my knowledge on from being a former Mazda Service manager this is some of the stuff that's different as the years went by, this will apply to all RX7's not just R1,R2's, touring,PEP,base, etc.

1. 94-95 Instrument cluster is different due to the fact of having no small indication lines between numbers
2. 94-95 Have smaller rear swaybars.
3. 94-95 Have different dash panels in the way that they're not painted and won't peel like the 93's
4. 94-95 Have 2 additional braces under the rear subframe to minimize the rear subframe from flexing under load(Mostly to try and prevent axle hop)
5. 94-95 Have dual airbags.
6. The EGR system on the 94-95 is different.
7. The 93's were the only ones that came with chrome colored intake manifold nuts.
8. The 93's intake elbow on the throttle body was grey colored, not black like the 94-95.
9. Touring didn't exist in 95 it was replaced by the PEP package, even though the PEP package was introduced earlier in 94.
10. Only Tourings came with glass sunroofs.
11. Only 93 offered a CYM(Competition Yellow Mica) on R1 models
12. There was no white RX7 in 93, only 94-95.
13. R1 and R2's only came in Yellow, Red, Black, and Silver.
14. 95 RX7's used R134 A/C refrigerant, not R12 like the 93-94.
15. 95 RX7's also used a lighter ABS system than the 93-94.
That's all I can think of right now that some people don't know about if I think of anything else I'll let you guys know.
BrianK is offline  
Old 10-25-01, 05:15 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
JspecFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
On paper and assuming that everything is stock and everything equal, an R1 will be very slightly faster. The R2 disadvantages over the R1 are more weight(another 14 lbs for the '94) and the softer suspension setup.
JspecFD is offline  
Old 01-20-05, 04:23 PM
  #4  
Junior Member

 
officat2u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what about the base

what about the base model, is it just as fast
officat2u is offline  
Old 01-20-05, 04:29 PM
  #5  
Power Trippin'

iTrader: (4)
 
SpeedKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Land of The Quick
Posts: 3,129
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by JspecFD

On paper and assuming that everything is stock and everything equal, an R1 will be very slightly faster.
Sounds like a load of horseshit to me. Your proof?
SpeedKing is offline  
Old 01-20-05, 04:35 PM
  #6  
Power Trippin'

iTrader: (4)
 
SpeedKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Land of The Quick
Posts: 3,129
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by officat2u

what about the base model, is it just as fast
*All* FDs (Base, Touring, R1, R2, PEP, PEG) were rated @ 255 hp, so you tell me.
SpeedKing is offline  
Old 01-20-05, 05:02 PM
  #7  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
rotoboy661's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: kali
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeedKing
*All* FDs (Base, Touring, R1, R2, PEP, PEG) were rated @ 255 hp, so you tell me.
rotoboy661 is offline  
Old 01-20-05, 07:20 PM
  #8  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
kuroi FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: orlando/st. petersburg
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
on a road track though suspension wise the r1 r2s may have a very slight advantage. and maybe launching as well i dont know i dont think it has ever been tested.
kuroi FD is offline  
Old 01-20-05, 10:50 PM
  #9  
Rotary Freak

 
mad_7tist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: tampa
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
best functional feature is the twin oil coolers on the r1/r2. oh and the lip everyone now wants...
mad_7tist is offline  
Old 01-21-05, 10:23 AM
  #10  
Hyper Boost 20B

 
Killa_FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only difference between the R1 and R2 is that R2 the shocks are softer then the R1. Thats the only difference between the two.
Killa_FD is offline  
Old 01-21-05, 05:42 PM
  #11  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Killa_FD
The only difference between the R1 and R2 is that R2 the shocks are softer then the R1. Thats the only difference between the two.
Better do some research killa. You are way off. Read the post by Brian above. In addition to all that, the 94-95 cars had slightly taller & softer springs.
adam c is offline  
Old 01-28-05, 11:32 AM
  #12  
Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
dgeesaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Kickass
Posts: 12,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
My question is, why is this still in advanced tech section?

This is FAQ material.
dgeesaman is offline  
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
03-15-22 12:04 PM
Shainiac
Single Turbo RX-7's
12
07-17-19 02:20 PM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
alfred1976
1st Gen General Discussion
6
10-01-17 09:51 PM
Ian_D
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
09-06-15 10:38 PM



Quick Reply: R1 vs. R2 - what are the differences



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 PM.